Search for: "State v. Plant" Results 1321 - 1340 of 4,033
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2009, 1:42 pm
The lunacy on display came from the Lyndon La Rouche followers--but that's been a steady state condition since at least the mid 1970s when they were claiming that US nuclear plants were better built than Jane Fonda--which assumes a fact not in evidence. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm by David Russcol
That is a significant change in the law because the Supreme Judicial Court held in the 2012 case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm by David Russcol
That is a significant change in the law because the Supreme Judicial Court held in the 2012 case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 1:45 am
On October 14, 2011 the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals released its opinion in Lewis v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
The patent was for insect-repellent pepper plants. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:09 am by Amy Howe
Caulkett and Bank of America v. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 10:59 am by Jon
The closest one finds is the 14th Amendment, except that it only authorizes penal legislation applicable to state actors, not to private persons generally, and the offenders in this case were not state actors.The authority cited for all of these charges is the Commerce Clause, interpreted as authorizing criminal penalties under the Necessary and Proper Clause, mainly based on the Supreme Court precedent in Wickard v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 1:59 am
In so holding, the Fifth Circuit relied heavily on the United States Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 7:20 am
EPA (07-588), on the Clean Water Act and the regulation of power plant cooling structures. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 11:20 am
Over 50 members of congress have signed a letter asking USDA to keep genetically engineered alfalfa out of commercial use in light of the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:25 pm by Joe Koncelik
 One action it took was to deny a petition from twelve states and several cities to regulate GHGs under Section 202(a)(1). [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
He did not disclose the inventions to anyone in the United States before he applied for United States patents. [read post]