Search for: "State v. Taylor "
Results 1321 - 1340
of 3,341
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
"The court also noted that the Village was not barred by the doctrine of equitable estoppel from terminating Plaintiff’s post-retirement health care benefits.In McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, 92 N.Y.2d 326, the Court of Appeals concluded that "there is no legal impediment to the municipality's unilateral alteration of the past practice" regarding its providing health insurance benefits to its retirees and their dependents where there was neither a Taylor… [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
The decisions states that these part-time employees, presumably appointed to positions jurisdictionally classified as positions in the noncompetitive class, were not represented by an employee organization. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:57 am
State Senator Lena Taylor objected that the bill “breaks down the wall of independence around independent agencies. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:38 am
However, recent Supreme Court, federal court, and agency decisions have ignored this longstanding analysis and have instead examined these issues through the lens of Taylor v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 10:11 am
Judge Moore's opinion for the Court in Taylor v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:14 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 1:24 pm
Today's published opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 3:03 am
Drawing on the analytical methodology laid out in several Supreme Court opinions, including Taylor v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 3:20 am
See Jewelers Vigilance Comm., Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2016, 5:00 am
See Op. at 3-4 citing Taylor v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am
" Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division explained that "[T]he substantial evidence standard is a minimal standard" that is "less than a preponderance of the evidence, and demands only that a given inference is reasonable and plausible, not necessarily the most probable. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am
" Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division explained that "[T]he substantial evidence standard is a minimal standard" that is "less than a preponderance of the evidence, and demands only that a given inference is reasonable and plausible, not necessarily the most probable. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
An arbitrator's award may only be vacated by a court if it violates public policy, is irrational or it exceeds specified limitations on the arbitrator's powerSubway Surface Supervisors Assn. v New York City Tr. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 3:03 am
After holding that “the subject of the claim sought to be arbitrated is the type authorized by the Taylor Law,” the Appellate Division explained: Contrary to the District's contention, an arbitrator's award in favor of the Association would not violate public policy. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:27 pm
The court in Taylor v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:45 am
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Soni v Pryor, 102 AD3d 856, 858 [2d Dept 2013]). [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:39 am
As he said in A v B, “The [public figure] should recognise that because of his public position he must expect and accept that his actions will be more closely scrutinised by the media. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
A party to a stipulation of settlement cannot withdraw from the stipulation on the basis that it had "improvidently"agreed to itState of New York v Public Employment. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:18 am
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland), heard 22 – 23 January 2014. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 10:13 am
"A [Taylor Law] contract may … prohibit disciplinary action in the face of pending criminal charges. [read post]
