Search for: "TAYLOR v. STATE"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 3,088
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2010, 4:32 am
Schimke, 718 P.2d 635 (Kan. 1986); Taylor v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 7:17 am
Taylor, No. 06 Civ. 3676 (PAC) (KNF), 2006 U.S. [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 10:42 am
In United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 12:51 pm
Stitt and U.S. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 11:40 am
Taylor, 2009 U.S. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 10:31 am
" This is only the second time the Third Circuit has relied upon that language; the first time was in Taylor v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:41 am
In addition, Civil Service Law Section 209-a.6, a subdivision that is part of the Taylor Law, provides that “In applying this section, fundamental distinctions between private and public employment shall be recognized, and no body of federal or state law applicable wholly or in part to private employment, shall be regarded as binding or controlling precedent. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:44 am
App. 2014); Taylor v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 6:42 pm
’ United States v Holman, 314 F.3d 837, 840 (7th Cir.2002). [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 4:00 am
See Olson v. [read post]
17 Oct 2024, 3:18 am
In his famous concurrence in Youngstown Sheet v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:58 am
The case Nancy Wells v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:58 am
The case Nancy Wells v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 5:42 am
Once a victim arrived, Flanders and Callum used a date rape drug to put her in a semi-catatonic state, raped her, and recorded the activity on videotape for sale and distribution as pornography.In 2008, Internet Brands purchased Model Mayhem from Donald and Taylor Waitts, the original developers of the site. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
From State v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 10:00 pm
See Mosby v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
” Holding that Petitioners' interpretation of EO 75 was not plausible, the majority concluded that Petitioners “have not demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits,” the Appellate Division granted the appeal.* With respect to the State as the employer, employee organization leave has been an issue since the adoption of the Taylor Law. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 5:43 pm
Taylor, 529 U. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 7:26 pm
Taylor, 329 U.S. 495 (1947), which was codified in Court of Chancery Rule 26(b)(3), which states the current iteration of the Delaware work-product rule. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 3:12 am
The court said “the simple answer is that, as Chief of a Town police force, [Wade] was not a State employee. [read post]
