Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 4,753
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
In Burnham and UFT, 28 PERB 4590, PERB ruled that the union's "duty of fair representation" runs only to employees; there is no such duty with respect to former unit members such as retirees [See, also, McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, 92 N.Y.2d 326; Kolbe v Tibbetts, 22 NY3d 344].** Retirees are not employees for the purposes of collective bargaining for the purposes of Article 14 of the Civil Service Law [the Taylor Law] The decision is… [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 9:22 am
Deal v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
Employee's resignation after being found guilty of disciplinary charges forfeits his or her right to demand arbitrationMatter of the Arbitration between Unit 8251, Local 842, CSEA v City of Troy, 169 AD2d 871 Under the terms of a Taylor Law agreement, an employee against whom disciplinary charges had been filed was entitled to a three step disciplinary proceeding. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 4:45 am
A copy of the SEC Complaint is accessible here: SEC v Temenos & Taylor Temenos, founded by Taylor, is a Connecticut corporation headquartered in Litchfield, CT, with additional offices located in St. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 7:49 am
See Taylor v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 7:49 am
See Taylor v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 10:23 pm
Taylor. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 10:23 pm
Taylor. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 8:08 am
Viral Belief The case—Fallon v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 8:08 am
Viral Belief The case—Fallon v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 2:12 am
Claims made by Carlton were not properly regarded as claims made by Taylor Clark as representative of the VAT Group. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 10:44 am
In Taylor v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:34 am
v=UrtVZftjbhk. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 3:30 pm
Alvarez 17-1695 Issue: Whether, if a court determines that a complaint filed by one shareholder does not plead demand futility with the requisite particularity, the due process clause and the Supreme Court’s decisions in Taylor v. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 8:50 am
* Burke v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 10:49 am
The decision in Janus v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 10:49 am
The decision in Janus v. [read post]
