Search for: "U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS"
Results 1321 - 1340
of 7,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2010, 7:10 pm
The Miami office of the U.S. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 3:30 am
(opinion here) concluded just the opposite: sexual orientation discrimination is “reprehensible,” but does not violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 4:05 am
Yesterday the court heard oral arguments in a trio of high-profile civil-rights cases involving LBGT employees: consolidated cases Bostock v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:23 am
Holder,[1] the federal government has continued to extend protection under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) to transgender employees. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 10:33 am
However, the EU has yet to enact the E-Evidence Regulation, which has been mired in lengthy disputes among the European Parliament, European Commission and member states, primarily over civil liberties issues. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 3:30 am
Such alleged conduct violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:30 am
For starters, that would violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:30 am
For starters, that would violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 9:57 pm
Patent No. 7,315,190, claims 29 or 34 of U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:41 am
Securities Fraud Claims Seeking Civil Penalties Must Be Brought in Federal Court On June 27, the U.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 6:02 pm
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 expressly prohibits workplace discrimination on the basis of sex, national religion, race, color, national origin, and religion. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 3:30 am
Clayton County that an employer who fires an individual merely for being gay or transgender has discriminated based on sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:01 am
Although the High Court did not find the law incompatible with the Human Rights Act (the U.K. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 5:54 pm
That's why it is important to keep the pressure on the Congress, to preserve our rights and the Marco Civil da Internet. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 4:01 am
The highest EU court perceives U.S. intelligence agencies to have the authority to collect excessive data to protect U.S. national security, and also ruled that such agencies suffer from perceived deficits of independent oversight and judicial redress rights and remedies—particularly for non-U.S. persons. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 7:30 am
A recent decision by the U.S. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 1:10 am
And they help explain the recent action of the chairs of the Congressional-Executive Commission on China to the U.S. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 7:49 am
Court: American citizens have a constitutionally protected right to travel by air; USA: DOT fines ticket agents for code-share disclosure violations; Egypt: tourism minister sends message to travel industry via YouTube; U.S. travel industry worried about anti-gay law in Russia; USA: DOT releases guidance for Internet flight-search tools;German court requests ECJ preliminary ruling with regard to passport data;UK: OFT consults on proposed hotel booking… [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 12:26 pm
Washington (Treaty Right to Fish - Culvert Impacts)U.S. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 6:33 am
” However, NAICJA prefers that all individuals charged with crimes under this enhanced tribal jurisdiction be provided with civil rights protections equivalent to those guaranteed by the Indian Civil Rights Act, instead of the U.S. [read post]
