Search for: "Alexander v. Alexander" Results 1341 - 1360 of 2,867
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2012, 6:56 am by Kiran Bhat
Yesterday the Court granted cert. in Chafin v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 11:37 am by Greg Mersol
The authority for the unusual proposition that in the face of a unanimous decision the court should look to a single concurrence is a string cite that includes the case of Alexander v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 11:56 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Igor Poteroba, Aleksey Koval and Alexander VorobievCase number: 10-cv-2667 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: March 24, 2010Qualifying judgment/order: January 15, 2013 02/08/2013 05/09/2013 2013-12 SEC v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
The law in this regard was summarised by Arnold J in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v SEB SA [2014] EWHC 445 (Pat) at [103]: “[103] As Kitchin LJ and Sir Robin Jacob said in their joint judgment in Gedeon  Richter plc v Bayer Pharma AG[2012] EWCA Civ 235, [2013] Bus LR D17 at [61], ‘it is trite law that… the older (from the priority date of a patent under attack) a piece of prior art said to render a patent obvious, the harder it is to show… [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal considers the threshold for bringing a libel claim in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd – Iain Wilson and Tom Double Lachaux, Seriously limiting serious harm – Nicola Cain Court of Appeal clarifies serious harm test in Lachaux libel judgment – Ashley Hurst and Alexander Vakil. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal considers the threshold for bringing a libel claim in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd – Iain Wilson and Tom Double Lachaux, Seriously limiting serious harm – Nicola Cain Court of Appeal clarifies serious harm test in Lachaux libel judgment – Ashley Hurst and Alexander Vakil. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal considers the threshold for bringing a libel claim in Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd – Iain Wilson and Tom Double Lachaux, Seriously limiting serious harm – Nicola Cain Court of Appeal clarifies serious harm test in Lachaux libel judgment – Ashley Hurst and Alexander Vakil. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
Monday’s second case is Georgia v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 12:52 pm
Alexander, 655 F.2d 1281, 1288-89 (D.C. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 11:36 am by Jennifer Davis
Before Bostock: the accidental LGBTQ precedent of Price Waterhouse v. [read post]