Search for: "BULL V US" Results 1341 - 1360 of 2,311
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2010, 1:30 pm by Eugene Volokh
This turns out to be important in the case involving the jail strip search / visual body cavity search policy, Bull v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 8:47 pm by Stu Ellis
Saflufenacil product (Sharpen, Optill, or Verdict) plus MSO (1% v/v) plus either glyphosate or Ignite Along with the burndown treatment the weed specialists urge you to use a residual herbicide. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 5:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In this action, plaintiff alleges the following: Defendant law firm “unnecessarily introduced a limiting feature in the applications that was not contained in the specification portion of the applications wherein plaintiff’s inventions are described” (Complaint ¶ 11); Defendant law firm “filed a design patent application . . . which included references to some of plaintiff’s registered trademarks that were incorrectly used… [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 1:25 pm by William Appleton
  Hadley Baker shared an episode of Lawfare No Bull which featured oral arguments from Dec. 7, 2022 in Blassingame v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 7:51 am by Tom B
Throughout my years with the IGDA I contributed to numerous IGDA White Papers including: Publisher Contract Walkthrough v.1 - 2003 Publisher Contract Walkthrough v.2 - 2003 Intellectual Property Rights White Paper - 2003 Quality of Life White Paper - 2004 Publisher Contract Walkthrough v.3 - 2006 King.com - Position Statement on Trademarks (Editor)- 2015 DMCA IP… [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 5:27 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
But when a PIP is used for the sake of appearances or implemented in half-hearted fashion, courts and juries tend to see right through the subterfuge. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 9:35 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Bull, but the alleged violation there is potentially one of Due Process, not the "public use" requirement. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 11:46 pm by Brian Cordery (Bristows)
Referring back to his judgment in MedImmune v Novartis in which he introduced the concept of ‘sequential unmasking’, Arnold LJ made the following comments: The lawyers instructing an expert should ensure that the expert discloses all their own previous relevant publications and, where appropriate, explains them in their report. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 6:38 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
These were not the doors that people were supposed to use when entering and exiting the commissary. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:34 am by Rachel, Law Clerk
Starts Clock on Donald Sterling’s Potential Ouster Oregon becomes 18th state to legalize gay marriage, weddings already begunFederal judge strikes Oregon’s same-sex marriage ban; 9th Circuit denies motion to stay order NYPD Commissioner-Turned-Felon Bernie Kerik Has a Message For Us Now That He's Been to PrisonTrio of prominent lawyers seeking LSUC’s top elected job Ontario criminal lawyers rally around colleague sentenced to two years for smuggling drugs into Don… [read post]
2 May 2018, 12:22 am
Now, Kat Eleonora tells us that, after complaints and claims of violation of IP rights, in the end Fearless Girl will be moved due to ... viability concerns. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 3:32 pm by Lee Smith
  Please contact us if you have any questions. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:52 pm
In October 2006, the RSC applied for a declaration of invalidity on a number of grounds, including: the ROYAL SHAKESPEARE mark was of such a nature as to deceive the public, for instance as to the nature, quality or geographical origin of the goods or services; its use without due cause would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental to, the distinctive character or the repute of its earlier trade marks, which were well¬known in the… [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 9:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The Changing Landscape for Marketing Health and Nutrition Benefits, Part 2 Anne V. [read post]