Search for: "Britain v. Britain"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 1,618
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2010, 1:05 am
The ship is the M/V Mavi Marmara passenger ship, formerly owned and operated by a Turkish ferry company and now owned by a Turkish Islamist charity, the Foundation for Human Rights and Freedom and Humanitarian Relief. [read post]
29 May 2010, 8:41 pm
Session V (Infringement Exemptions, Fair Use, and Exhaustion) Patent Act §287(c)(1): methods of surgery are patentable, but not enforceable against doctors, helping personnel, or institutions in which they’re done—Dan Burk says it’s a complicated and unclear provision. [read post]
29 May 2010, 4:18 am
Britain is not isolated when it comes to protecting privacy solely by civil means, but European countries other than Italy also protect the right through the criminal courts. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:25 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) L’Oreal SA & Ors v Bellure NV & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 535 (21 May 2010) Re W (Children) [2010] EWCA Civ 537 (20 May 2010) Groveholt Ltd v Hughes & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 538 (20 May 2010) MJ (Angola) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 557 (20 May 2010) Condron, R (on the application of) v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 534 (20 May 2010) Nessa v London… [read post]
16 May 2010, 4:28 pm
Thus it could be argued that in Britain a statutory provision which allowed an administrative body to remove a person’s internet access would be incompatible with Article 10. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:38 am
Supreme Court: Abbott v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 12:59 am
The European Court of Justice ruled that Britain was wrong to restrict social security payments to the wives of three men on a list of people with alleged links to al-Qaeda, the Taleban and Osama bin Laden. [read post]
2 May 2010, 1:36 am
M and Others v Her Majesty’s Treasury, Case C? [read post]
1 May 2010, 1:22 am
The then Lord Justice Neuberger was one the Court of Appeal judges in the seminal 2005 privacy decision in Douglas v Hello! [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 1:40 pm
Britain spends $80/person, Canada $27/person, and those are the stingy ones. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 7:31 am
This contract sets out my side of the bargain: the things I want to do to change Britain. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:05 am
Rejecting that request, in McFarlane v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 6:54 am
Opinion below (5th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Title: Cablevision Systems Corporation v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 12:24 am
As a common law principle, the banking sector has long functioned under the value of confidentiality, largely embodied in the famous 1924 United Kingdom decision, Tournier v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 12:14 am
Merpel says, some cynical folk would say that far too much money is being ploughed into football and not nearly enough is being spent in Britain's pubs; is Euroview's aim to redress the balance? [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:21 pm
The evacuations occurred in three waves - the first (and largest) occurring before bombing began, between September 1-3, 1939; the second after the beginning of the “blitz” in 1940; and the last when the V-1 and V-2 rockets attacked London and the southeast of England in 1944. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 5:02 pm
The conduct of our Assembly in preventing such men, (meaning such unqualified Voters) is similar to the conduct of Great Britain in taxing the colonies; and it is a right old Tory plan, (meaning that the said Laws were oppressive, unjust and tyrannical.) [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 1:36 pm
His legal team is also appealing worldwide – to the governments of Britain, Ireland and Luxembourg - for help.Ahmed, a 39 year-old accountant, was visibly terrified during his attorney visit earlier this month and remains a tragic figure in Guantánamo. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 10:33 pm
AND MARPER v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:45 pm
Read more: T & Ors R v [2009] EWCA Crim 1035 (Court of Appeal judgment in June 2009) More posts on Article 6 ECHR [read post]
