Search for: "Brooks v. Brooks"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 2,703
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2016, 2:36 pm
” Citing a recent opinion (Brooke v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 7:13 pm
One of the most important of those was the precedent set in the 2000 case of Brooks v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 11:31 am
In Prodromos v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:16 pm
The clear answer seems to be Grover Norquist, correctly described by David Brooks as someone who "enforces rigid ultimatums that make governance, or even thinking, impossible. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 1:19 pm
.), it's also easy to imagine that the struggle for civil rights ended in the 1960s, when segregationists in the South lost their fight against the Civil Rights Act and Brown v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 5:30 am
Congress since 1856’s Brooks v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
In Minor v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 2:52 am
., Plaintiffs-Appellants, - v - THE LAW OFFICES OF DAVID M. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 12:21 am
Capitol, LLC, 90 AD3d at 627).Additionally, the plaintiff failed to timely serve a notice of claim on the District, which is a condition precedent to the commencement of an action against a school district (see Education Law § 3813[1]; Matter of Zelin v Blind Brook-Rye Union Free Sch. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
: (Part 1 - SPICY IP), (Part 2 - SPICY IP) Global – Copyright International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI): ‘Three strikes’ effort hit worldwide home run: (Ars Technica), How to attribute a Creative Commons licensed work: (Molly Kleinman), Chrysalis disappoints, as new artists fail to incubate: (IP finance), DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) Events 26 August:… [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 2:45 pm
Brooks, 2008 U.S. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 5:47 am
Brooks delivered the decision.Link: [tinyurl.com] . [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:26 am
In this week’s case (Thomas v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 2:53 am
There is no evidence in the record to support plaintiffs’ expert accountant’s assumption that if DFS had taken the same actions against plaintiffs nine months earlier, plaintiffs would have undertaken the same remedial measures nine months earlier (see Brooks v Lewin, 21 AD3d 731, 734-735 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 713 [2006]). [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 9:38 am
Brooks, 577 S.W.2d 207: (Tenn. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 10:19 am
Brooks Brothers, Inc., No. 2009-1428 (Fed. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
Frye, No. 10-444, and Lafler v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 10:19 am
Brooks Brothers, Inc., No. 2009-1428 (Fed. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 6:38 am
In last week’s case (Brooks-Martin v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 12:54 pm
" [T]he due process protections required for a risk level classification proceeding are not as extensive as those required in a plenary criminal or civil trial' " (People v Brooks, 308 AD2d 99, 105, lv denied 1 NY3d 502, quoting Doe v Pataki, 3 F Supp 2d 456, 470). [read post]
