Search for: "Cox v. Cox" Results 1341 - 1360 of 1,561
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2007, 9:44 am by Tobias Thienel
Vooght [1999] BPIR 376, 387 [CA, per May LJ])The same principles are recognised in the legal orders of the Republic of Ireland (Cox v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Some practitioners were surprised that Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17 reached the country’s highest court. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
With that said, the book provides insights relevant to analyzing the Court’s recent decision in Trump v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 12:45 pm by Unknown
"A Cross-Sectional Quantitative Study on Sexual and Reproductive Health Knowledge and Access to Services of Arab and Kurdish Syrian Refugee Young Women Living in an Urban Setting in Lebanon," International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 18, no. 18 (Sept. 2021) [open access] - Authors (3) = Germany Dobbs v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 12:00 pm by Unknown
Press, Forthcoming)- Preprint version- Author = South Africa"Imagining Possible Selves: Perceptions of Education among Young Migrant Women in South Africa," Chapter in Education, Migration and Development: Critical Perspectives in a Moving World (Bloomsbury, Oct. 2022) - Scroll to p. 229.- Author = South Africa(Re)pensando el vínculo entre migración y crisis: Perspectivas desde América Latina y Europa (CALAS & CLASCO, 2021) - Editors (3) =… [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 2:51 am by Mandelman
The Permanent Editorial Board of the Uniform Law Institute (you know what that is if you listened to my recent podcast with attorney Thomas Cox), has just a few days ago published a paper rendering an opinion on the Article 3 v. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm by INFORRM
  Professor Brian Cox handed a petition to Downing Street calling for a public interest defence in defamation cases to protect the science community from spurious litigation. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:42 pm
A letter from shareholders to the Honorable Christopher Cox, requesting a return to the pre-1990 interpretation of the Rule, stressed an important distinction: ". . . between using a shareholder resolution as a back-door device to contest a specific election and using a shareholder resolution in order to change the rules for election so as to further the long-term interests of shareholders. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 11:06 pm by Jeff Gamso
The execution of a person who can show that he is innocent comes perilously close to simple murder.Herrera v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
.; see generally Cox Operating, L.L.C. v. [read post]