Search for: "Does 1 - 23"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 15,473
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2015, 1:47 pm
¶¶ 23, 41 (Teva v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 11:00 am
How does one fairly rank world universities? [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:35 am
Co. 301 AD2d 23, 33 (1 sl Dept. 2002); see also Veras Investment Parners. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
However, since D.C. is not a state and does not have a governor, the president has the authority to activate the DCNG. [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 10:29 am
Lester, No. 1:09cr00002, 2009 WL 902354, at *6-7 (W.D. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 5:10 am
Manfredi, 722 F.2d 519, 522-23 (9th Cir. 1984). [read post]
22 May 2020, 6:18 am
” The NPC’s move does nothing to dispel that view. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 7:27 pm
A bill has passed the New Jersey Senate and Assembly and which is now before the governor that intends to amend the current alimony statute, N.J.S.A. 2A34-23. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 am
As I read section 27, this simply does not follow. [read post]
31 May 2012, 1:45 pm
At least 18 hospitalized; one possible death At least 93 people in 23 states have fallen ill from Salmonella infections linked to Mt. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 8:39 am
Nov. 1, 2016). [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 5:51 pm
The training wage is no longer allowed after July 23, 2009. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 7:57 am
On the other hand, this list does not cover inventions outside the medical or pharmaceutical field. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
As a result, Bill 47 repeals section 1 (1) and the definition of “difference in employment status” in subsection 1 (1) of the Employment Standards Act. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 6:50 am
page=getobject&objectname=mcl-552-23 https://www.marketwatch.com/story/new-tax-law-eliminates-alimony-deductions-but-not-for-everybody-2018-01-23 https://taxfoundation.org/2017-tax-brackets/Read More [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 2:01 pm
Under Indiana law, the maximum amount that can be recovered for the death of an adult who leaves behind no dependents is $300,000 (Ind.Code 34-23-1-2). [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:08 pm
Priority claim and novelty in view of D81.1 The opposition division concluded that the priority of D1 was not validly claimed and that D8, which was as a result a document according to Article 54(3) EPC, and in particular its example 1, was novelty destroying for claim 1 of the main request (points 3.1 and 3.2 of the reasons).1.2 Example 1 of D8 discloses the polymerization of VCM under continuous metering of Trigonox 187 as organic peroxide initiator (paragraphs… [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 8:15 am
The award is significant because it recognizes that individuals are eligible to receive an award for: (1) being the original source of information the CFTC receives from another regulator; and (2) a tip that leads to evidence of a violation the CFTC ultimately charges, even if the reported conduct itself does not form the basis for those charges. [read post]
29 May 2023, 6:17 am
You should also ask the cruise line for an answer to the simple yes or no questions: (1) does the balcony have a sprinkler valve, and (2) does the balcony have a smoke/heat alarm? [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 8:19 am
Code § 27.005(b)(1)-(3). [read post]
