Search for: "Does 1-20 inclusive"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 1,619
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2012, 1:04 pm
A standard does two things. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am
A shareholders' meeting was held on October 2, 2008, at which they approved by a vote of 11-1 the closing of the Surgicare purchase, the terms of a proposed loan from JPMorgan Chase to OBA, and certain by-law amendments permitting the transaction. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:00 am
A shareholders' meeting was held on October 2, 2008, at which they approved by a vote of 11-1 the closing of the Surgicare purchase, the terms of a proposed loan from JPMorgan Chase to OBA, and certain by-law amendments permitting the transaction. [read post]
13 May 2012, 6:57 pm
Thiemer:1. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:09 pm
All investors in these funds must be (i) an accredited investor, as defined in Regulation D or (ii) a qualified client, as defined in federal regulations. [2] However, the exemption does not allow private fund managers that advise a 3(c)(1) fund to accept accredited investors who are individuals that qualify solely by the income test.[3] The inclusion of certain categories of accredited investors within 3(c)(1) funds is a… [read post]
6 May 2012, 11:52 am
Id. at 20. [read post]
3 May 2012, 12:58 pm
EIA estimates that the legislation would reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the power sector by 20 percent in 2025 and by 44 percent in 2035. [read post]
1 May 2012, 1:02 am
Only 23% of plaintiff fee awards were $1 million or higher, while 44 percent were at or under $500,000 or under. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
§ 8-1-150. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
The full list of resolved complaints from last week: Mr Peter Reynolds v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 20/04/2012; Samaritans, Mind, Rethink Mental Illness, Sane and PAPYRUS Prevention of Young Suicide v The Sun, Clause 5, 19/04/2012; Mr Adam Stephens v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mr Peter Reynolds v Harborough Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mrs Drene Brown v Scunthorpe Telegraph, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; A woman v Hastings and St Leonards Observer,… [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:50 am
The procedure for placing a stomach tube takes about 20 minutes and requires the use of a hospital operating room. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
The PCC has not made any new adjudications during its transition period, but there are several resolved cases to report: Mr Philip Bovey v The Independent, Clause 12, 26/03/2012; Mr Nic Bullough v Southern Daily Echo, Clause 1, 23/03/2012; Mr Freddie Wright v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 23/03/2012; Dr John Glasspool v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 23/03/2012; The Scottish Refugee Council v Scottish Daily Mail, Clause 1, 23/03/2012; Ms Lucy Buckingham v Southport… [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:16 am
"The increase from a 50 percent inclusion rate to 66.6 percent will apply when a company or close corporation sells a property, which translates into an average of 18.6 percent, up from the previous 14 percent, and trusts' rates have increased from 20 percent to 26.7 percent. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:11 am
As of Dec. 1, 2012, cigarettes there will have to be sold in dark brown packets, with no company logos or images and the same font for all brands. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Does any monograph count? [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:07 am
American Conference Institute's FDA Boot Camp conference is scheduled for March 20-21 in New York, NY. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 4:43 pm
” (FDC Act § 505(q)(1)(G)). [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 5:41 am
The law does not permit it. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 1:03 pm
As Ed points out, if the dividend and capital gains rate rose from 15% to 20% (which also has a good chance of happening), then there'd be an odd neutrality under some circumstances.Case 1, earn $100 through a corporation, leaving $75 after corporate tax. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 11:00 am
Using human rights in refugee law – The need to proceed with caution A well-founded fear of being persecuted is a core requirement for a finding of refugee status under the Refugee Convention.[1] Although the Refugee Convention does not define persecution and there is no universally accepted definition,[2] most definitions tend to stress the need for serious harm and link persecution in some way to a violation of human rights. [read post]
