Search for: "Does 1-29" Results 1341 - 1360 of 12,901
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2010, 9:23 am
The short answer is no:A communication under Rule 161 EPC (both in its amended form as well as in the version applicable until 31 March 2010), despite emanating from the examining division in compliance with Rule 10 EPC, is not a substantive communication within the meaning of amended Rule 36(1) EPC and therefore does not cause the time limit for the filing of voluntary or mandatory divisional applications to start.Practitioners are advised to read the notice in full here. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 3:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
Sept. 29, 2022), that case makes no reference to repressed memories or tolling. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
There is less January 1st activity than we usually see, but this does not mean 2018 was a quiet year. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 6:06 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Accordingly, the Court ruled that the “public duty doctrine does not apply to the claims as stated in the complaint that come under the purview of § 29-20-203” and reversed the dismissal. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 2:50 pm by Kirk Jenkins
– (1) Does the doctrine of subject matter waiver for the attorney-client privilege extend from litigation to business negotiations? [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 6:22 am by Barry Sookman
If anyone other than the holder of copyright in a certain work supplies a clickable link to the work on his website, does that constitute communication to the public within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society? [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 6:58 am by admin
getdoc+uscview+t09t12+3739+0++%28%29%20%20AND%20%28%2811%29%20ADJ%20USC%29%3ACITE%20AND%20%28USC%20w%2F10%20%28105%29%29%3ACITE%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20 , to stay the ex-wife’s motion and any similar proceeding, pending further order from the Court. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 11:06 am
California Appellate Districts, December 29, 2008 Grossmont Union High School Dist. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 2:42 pm by Ira Meislik
  ITEMS TO INCLUDE IN A LETTER OF INTENT FOR A LEASE 1. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 11:41 pm by Jeff Nowak
 After all, a chronic serious health condition is one which: Requires periodic visits (defined as at least twice a year) for treatment by a health care provider, or by a nurse under direct supervision of a health care provider. 29 C.F.R. 825.115(c)(1) (my emphasis). [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 10:30 am by Sarah Grant
District Court for the District of Columbia issued a memorandum opinion and order in the case of Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 1:48 pm by Kevin Kaufman
Nevada taxes wage income at a low rate under the state’s Modified Business Tax but does not tax investment income. [read post]