Search for: "ENGLAND v. STATE"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 3,671
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
The fight between Nestlé and Cadbury has already led to a judgment by the ECJ (yes), the High Court of England and Wales, the Singapore Court of Appeal and now (well, kind of now) the General Court (T-112/13). [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 3:52 am
The Facts The facts are simply stated. [read post]
28 Nov 2020, 2:36 pm
Edison Co. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:15 am
Born on October 30, 1735, Adams grew up in a modest New England home. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 4:03 am
In Re Marriage of England v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 7:53 am
And contrary to some commentators, the 1790 criminal piracy statute at issue in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:50 am
Note: For those lawyers among our readers, the District Court decision is Justin Goldman v. [read post]
3 Feb 2018, 8:34 pm
In the 1963 case of AFL v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 3:45 pm
However, the abstract merely stated that the combination was additive. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:06 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021… [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:36 am
”Matthews v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm
He gave Article 23 DPD a very narrow reading, contrary to CJEU decisions such as Case C–168/00 Leitner v TUI Deutschland GmbH [2002] ECR I–1631 (ECLI:EU:C:2002:163; ECJ, 12 March 2002), which held that compensation for “damage” must include both material and non-material damage, that is, both actual damage and distress (see also Case C-63/09 Walz v Clickair SA [2010] ECR I 4239 (ECLI:EU:C:2010:251; CJEU, 6 May 2010); Case… [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 1:08 am
On June 19, 1995 the United States Supreme Court handed down judgment in Hurley v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:47 am
The guiding principle in Scots law is Lawrie v Muir 1950 JC 19, which states that an irregularity in the method by which evidence has been obtained does not necessarily make that evidence inadmissible in a criminal prosecution [17]. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 4:12 pm
The Council argued that demand for the east of england was clear, but not the allocation to Basildon. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 4:12 pm
The Council argued that demand for the east of england was clear, but not the allocation to Basildon. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:00 pm
He was received by the pope with marked courtesy and was appointed grand penitentiary of England, but his argument, if discussed, did not lead to any practical decision of the divorce question.In 1532 he was sent to Germany, officially as ambassador to the emperor Charles V but with instructions to establish contact with the Lutheran princes. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 5:34 pm
A more plausible candidate for the international title might be Sydney, capital of the Australian State of New South Wales. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:20 am
Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]
