Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 1341 - 1360 of 7,356
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2020, 11:00 am by Karen Tani
Another prize awarded annually by the ASLH is the Peter Gonville Stein Book Award, for "the best book in non-US legal history written in English. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 5:42 am by Jonathan Fitchen
Thus, though the applicable law of the underlying contract was seemingly Russian, the applicable law of the arbitration agreement was to be presumed to be English due to the lack of an express choice of Russian law and due to the fact of the English arbitral seat. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm by rainey Reitman
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 2:31 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
Having agreed that any dispute arising from the contract should be settled at the English court, the appellant was bound by the terms of the contract. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 12:08 pm by Jeanne Huang
Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v Schlunk decided by the Supreme Court of the US and Segers and Rufa BV v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:38 am by Sean Hayes
The United States is a contracting state to the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (“Foreign Arbitral Awards Convention”). [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 1:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In the present proceedings, the appellants sought to rely on a number of factual findings made by the General Court in the course of its judgment and argued that the English courts are bound by those findings. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 2:00 am by Emma Irwin (Bristows)
Wyeth referred Meade J. to the Idenix v Gilead and KCI v Smith & Nephew cases when making its submissions on the principles of the law on CGK. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The first is Secretary of State for Health and Ors v Servier Laboratories and Ors. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 3:06 am by Claire Wood
The question for the English court to decide, within the couples’ English divorce some 8 years later (where the couple now lived), was whether this document was binding on them and the English court. [read post]