Search for: "Lee v. State" Results 1341 - 1360 of 4,591
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2023, 6:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To state a cause of action for legal malpractice, a party must allege that “(1) the attorneywas negligent; (2) the attorney’s negligence was a proximate cause of [the party’s] losses; and (3) [the party] suffered actual damages” (RTW Retailwinds, Inc. v Colucci & Umans, 231 AD3d 509, 510 [1st Dept 2023], citing Excelsior Capitol LLC v K & L Gates LLP, 138 AD3d 492 [1st Dept 2016]). [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Justice Michael Lee stated in his judgment that they were uncontradicted by any evidence in reply from Lehrmann. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am by Edith Roberts
First up is Washington State Department of Licensing v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 1:44 pm by NL
The decision was wrong because the decision-maker had misapplied the principles in Cadona v Mid-Bedfordshire Borough Council [2004] EWCA Civ 925. and Lee v Rhondda County Borough Council [2008] EWCA Civ 1013 . [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 1:44 pm by NL
The decision was wrong because the decision-maker had misapplied the principles in Cadona v Mid-Bedfordshire Borough Council [2004] EWCA Civ 925. and Lee v Rhondda County Borough Council [2008] EWCA Civ 1013 . [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 9:00 am by Dennis Crouch
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 9:40 am by Jon Sands
  State law (Az) did not require the giving of identity absent reasonable suspicion. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm by Jim Harper
(Tim Lee’s shorter Cato@Liberty post about Justice Stevens’ legacy in tech is here.) [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 9:01 am by Rachel Sachs
Perry and United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:45 am by Amy Howe
” At his Harmless Error blog, Luke Rioux discusses last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]