Search for: "Little v. Stevens" Results 1341 - 1360 of 1,498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Stephen Budiansky concerning Budiansky’s book “Oliver Wendell Holmes: A Life in War, Law, and Ideas” (W.W. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:50 am by Dan Farber
Before starting, here’s a little more background about the three cases: Texas v. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
A little further on into the park however a costumed employee allegedly ran up behind her and shouted loudly. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 3:17 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Beta test on flickr: large reservoir of 10,000 photos with a little explanation. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
The most straightforward way to understand his thinking is apparently that the pendency of the inevitable lawsuits would so roil the financial markets that the economy would be damaged in the meantime—AND that doing so would be worse than the alternatives.Again, he is right that there would be a political crisis, and the days, weeks, or months that the world would spend waiting for a resolution would make the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 8:58 pm
” [33] However, due to the fact that the Tribune Company filed separately from the Chicago Cubs organization, the team should be clear from such action. [34] V. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 8:00 am by Ronald Collins
There have been divergent applications of the theory in the same case, as exemplified by Justice Antonin Scalia’s majority opinion and Justice John Paul Stevens’ dissent in District of Columbia v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 12:01 pm by Anthony Gaughan
Baron’s essay challenges Scalia’s opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am by Amy Howe
Ginsburg’s return did little, however (remember, there’s no video), to stem conspiracy theories that she was still very ill or even dead. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
It has provided virtually no guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on the degree of statutory specificity necessary to provide agency authority over a major question . . . . [read post]