Search for: "Long Corporation v. the United States"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 3,660
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2018, 10:36 am
The military commission in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2018, 9:11 am
This symposium explores these and other issues.Keynote Lecture: James V Feinerman, Associate Dean for Transnational Programs, Co-Director, Georgetown Law Asia, and James M. [read post]
12 May 2018, 8:21 am
To the extent the border search exists to allow the United States to control its borders and interdict incoming or outbound contraband, it has already served its purpose. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
” Rusk State Hosp. v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 2:15 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:57 am
State v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 10:25 pm
at ¶¶ 5-7)On March 25, 2016, WTC removed the action to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. [read post]
7 May 2018, 9:09 am
As the court explained in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:00 am
Yet surely the United States should take a stand against corporate involvement in human rights violations by sanctioning firms that profit through abuse. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:44 am
Prior to the passage of the TCJA, the United States was one of six nations that had a worldwide corporate tax system. [read post]
2 May 2018, 8:57 am
The law struck down in Citizens United barred corporations and unions from spending any of their general treasury funds on such speech. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:29 pm
Supreme Court issued its much anticipated opinions in Jesner v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:12 pm
They have tended to focus on two main aspects of this interface: innovative legal-tech and interdisciplinary collaboration between law schools and STEM-oriented units. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 6:50 am
As in Kiobel, the facts of the case barely touch and concern the territory of the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:12 am
In Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 8:27 am
Immigration and Customs Enforcement revealed that thirty-nine Maritime employees, including the charging parties, were not authorized to work in the United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:00 am
In Kiobel, the Court held there was no jurisidiction over claims where all of the alleged relevant conduct occurred outside of the United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 5:01 am
Part V offers evidence that this remained true from 1880 to 1930. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 9:06 am
United States is the interpretation of a restitution statute applied in tens of thousands of criminal sentencing hearings each year. [read post]
