Search for: "MARTINEZ V. STATE"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 1,669
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm
If we were to view it this way, the law would survive, according to cases such as Ward v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 3:09 pm
Martinez, 4851, 5377/06, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2008 NY Slip Op 9898; 2008 N.Y. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 7:49 am
Supreme Court in Wayfair v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 8:30 am
NORMAN, Appellant, v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:50 am
’Murphy v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 12:23 am
Here are the granted issues in Sweeney: WHETHER, IN LIGHT OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT’S RULING IN MELENDEZ-DIAZ v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 10:23 pm
See United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 4:32 am
Smith v V.J Longhi Assoc. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 12:20 pm
The IWC definition of “employee” (as construed in Martinez v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
United States and Black v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:24 pm
Martinez Issue: Whether the subjective intent of an interrogating officer is relevant to the analysis under Missouri v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
Giving plaintiff 'the benefit of all favorable inferences which may be drawn from [the] pleading,' this Court determines only whether the alleged facts "fit within any cognizable legal theory' (Campaign for Fiscal Equity v State of New York, 86 NY2d 307, 318 [1995], quoting Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
Giving plaintiff 'the benefit of all favorable inferences which may be drawn from [the] pleading,' this Court determines only whether the alleged facts "fit within any cognizable legal theory' (Campaign for Fiscal Equity v State of New York, 86 NY2d 307, 318 [1995], quoting Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, December 18, 2008 Martinez v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Application of the remedial purpose canon to CERCLA successor liability issues after United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 10:52 am
Since an action for rectification and removal is indivisible it cannot be brought in each Member State in which the information is or was accessible.] [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 9:57 am
The long-awaited decision in IBT v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
Farina, 13-1227, a state-on-top habeas case involving how much leeway a federal court is allowed in determining that a state court made an unreasonable factual determination; and Whitman v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:19 am
In other big First Amendment news this week, the Court decided United States v. [read post]
