Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 1341 - 1360
of 14,914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2011, 1:00 am
It doesn't matter if you are walking outside of a crosswalk. [read post]
15 May 2010, 3:23 am
Congratulations, Justice Mark Dwyer. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:25 pm
Refer to our previous posts linked to above for more guidelines on what stations can and cannot do with regard to the Super Bowl and other registered marks. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 3:47 am
Taylor testified that he did not review the document “carefully enough to see that the statement is in [t]here incorrectly. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 9:54 am
(My article with Mark Lemley doesn't cover Elster, but it talks a bit about this dynamic.) [read post]
26 Nov 2021, 6:16 am
On 14 July 2021 the General Court (The Court) issued a decision in a matter between Cole Haan LLC (Cole Haan) and the Danish clothing company Samsøe and Samsøe Holding A/S (Samsøe and Samsøe) in the case T-399/20. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:18 pm
In re Boulevard Entm’t, Inc., 334 F.3d 1336, 1340 (Fed. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 3:26 am
”It follows, [para 11] that “[t]he offences set out in paragraphs (a), (b) and (c) of section 92 are, as a matter of plain reading, not cumulative, but separate. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 3:40 am
The Board not surprisingly affirmed a Section 2(a) refusal to register the mark MOMSBANGTEENS for "entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring photographic, audio, video and prose presentations featuring adult-oriented subject matter," finding the mark to be scandalous. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 8:38 am
Not a great deal, this Kat feels, except what we already know, which is that some things offend some people on some occasions and that the fact that trade mark registration is unavailable doesn't prevent brand owners using, and consumers choosing, brands that make use of affectionately naughty terms. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 8:09 am
The Board followed the rule from in In re Olin Corp., 181 USPQ 182 (TTAB 1973) (stylized “O” design registrable for T-shirts, where applicant had previously registered the “O” design for skis), where the Board stated: It is a matter of common knowledge that T-shirts are “ornamented” with various insignia . . . or … various sayings such as “Swallow Your Leader. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 8:09 am
The Board followed the rule from in In re Olin Corp., 181 USPQ 182 (TTAB 1973) (stylized “O” design registrable for T-shirts, where applicant had previously registered the “O” design for skis), where the Board stated: It is a matter of common knowledge that T-shirts are “ornamented” with various insignia . . . or … various sayings such as “Swallow Your Leader. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 1:46 pm
JOE BIDEN GETS high marks as a law professor. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am
Is the consumer construct different for different categories of trademark subject matter—e.g., for verbal versus visual marks? [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:11 pm
Not intended to replace proceedings about ownership, distinctiveness, abandonment: just show mark in use and if it isn’t and there aren’t special circumstances it may be expunged. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:14 pm
While it could easily take a matter of several minutes to do this with a video editing program, it takes only a matter of seconds, using something like TrialDirector.TrialDirector offers a number of options for playback of deposition video. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 10:14 am
Lincoln looked at me one short quizzical moment, and replied 'I can't.'"link: http://www.abrahamlincolnonline.org/lincoln/speeches/house.htm [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 8:36 am
The ad text didn't use BoostLash, and it did use WooLash, and it was marked as an ad; that's all that's required. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 8:38 am
Contracts are mostly private matters for the parties. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 11:35 am
Lawyers with billable targets don't have the time for this type of introspective approach. [read post]
