Search for: "Means v. State"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 61,653
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2023, 12:10 pm
Debates and scholarship over what the major questions doctrine is—and what it will mean for administrative law—have proliferated since the Supreme Court’s decisions in Alabama Realtors v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 12:57 pm
Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd. (1999), Preseault v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:32 pm
In People v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 12:54 am
On this day in history, US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall, writing for a unanimous Court, ruled in United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 6:00 am
Article I, §10 specifically states that “[n]o state shall . . . pass any . . . [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:23 am
At Monday's oral argument in Yeager v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 12:31 pm
Bank v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 8:19 am
United States and Gall v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 11:40 am
United States, No. 13-632, and Johnson v. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 6:40 pm
Zolg v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:53 am
On April 20, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 8:00 pm
There is a four factor-test for whether an area is a curtilage which was established in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:34 am
On 17 to 19 January 2012, the Supreme Court heard an appeal in the case of Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes . [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 12:24 pm
In Holmes v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 9:56 pm
LLC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 6:02 pm
R. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 1:16 pm
See Sealed Complaint at 2, United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 10:43 am
Gaulden v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 9:00 am
I believe Congress did not mean what it wrote, and that the Court will ignore the "plain meaning" rule to get at what Congress probably did mean. [read post]
