Search for: "People v Word"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 17,904
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2021, 2:06 pm
The Supreme Court will soon enough have the opportunity to weigh in on those issues in Dobbs v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 2:12 pm
Most people named Pat are indeed women. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:02 am
As the chief attorney for the National Association of Colored People (NAACP), he played a role in many civil rights cases, and was primarily responsible for developing the legal strategy that led to the Brown v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 4:37 pm
This principle most often arises in church property disputes, where the Supreme Court has held that courts may not decide which faction in a church is the more religiously orthodox, but it also applies more broadly to prohibit the government from adjudicating people’s rights based on theological judgments (see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 8:15 am
EU Citizenship for Stateless People? [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 10:36 am
The California Supreme Court addressed that issue today in the context of probation violations in People v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm
Here are real people in their own words, as gathered from trial records, various legal documents, and many other sources. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 3:27 pm
In People v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 4:33 pm
In other words, the abuse of modern technology for criminal purposes extends to and includes incitement of very many people by a single step. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am
The other referenced tags remind me of what the Ninth Circuit wrote in Perfect 10 v. ccBill (in the copyright context): “When a website traffics in pictures that are titillating by nature, describing photographs as ‘illegal’ or ‘stolen’ may be an attempt to increase their salacious appeal, rather than an admission that the photographs are actually illegal or stolen. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 12:04 pm
US v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:08 am
Until reading British Shorinji Kempo Federation v Shorinji Kempo Unity [2014] EWHC 285 (Ch) he had no idea that Shorinji Kempo even existed, and certainly no suspicion that his friends an neighbours might be getting up to it. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 1:51 pm
On February 6, 2014, the Michigan Court of Appeals issued People v Lubkin (Case No. 310359), an unpublished decision vacating a trial court’s conviction of Attorney Lubkin for criminal contempt. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 12:35 pm
On July 30, 2009, the Michigan Court of Appeals issued a published opinion in People v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:25 am
Thomas abused the law by ignoring the plain wording of a statute and, in fact, declaring that it didn't say what it did say. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 7:28 am
Lukis v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:18 am
The first is that people who are provoked by words that they find exceptionally painful, and who react to the infliction of verbal pain by killing, are weak people -- people acting out of a kind of akrasia. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
Aug. 29, 2004) (noting that the trial court had upheld a narrowly drawn criminal libel statute; the defendant did not argue the First Amendment on appeal); People v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:34 pm
In Donaca v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 9:35 am
Pritchard v. [read post]
