Search for: "People v. Daniel" Results 1341 - 1360 of 1,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2007, 8:07 pm
Attorney Daniel Alter in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in Doe v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 12:26 pm by Dave Hoffman
 Several of the attendees at the Conference approached me and remarked on my posts from CELS V, IV, and III. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:50 am by Colin Miller
According to the opinion of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin in Lees v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:51 am by Karina Lytvynska
By Atreya Mathur “By far, the greatest danger of Artificial Intelligence is that people conclude too early that they understand it. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 11:52 pm by Florian Mueller
Samsung case in California), slide-to-unlock (at issue in the ongoing Apple v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am by Josh Blackman
In contrast, the independent-counsel statute at issue in Morrison v. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
” They made sacrifices in service of their community, in the same way that constitutions must serve the people. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:34 am by Lyle Denniston
Two copies of the Papers wound up in the hands of a Rand Corporation analyst in California, who had worked on the study, Daniel Ellsberg. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Copyright protection expiration in China: lifetime plus fifty (IP Dragon) EU experience and practice must show China the way concerning IPR protection at exhibitions (IP Dragon) Comparison between IPR in China relevant provisions of Foreign Trade Law 2004 and 1994 (IP Dragon) Thesis and publications about IPR in China (IP Dragon) 2009: New trends in China’s judicial protection of intellectual property rights (China Law Insight) Best practices in technology transfer and IP licensing in… [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 6:51 am by Eric Goldman
I’m not sure what the future holds, but I do know that telcos will act like monopolistic pigs if given the chance. * Daniel v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 3:48 am by SHG
This was applied by Justice Mark Dwyer in People v. [read post]