Search for: "Queen v. Queen" Results 1341 - 1360 of 4,475
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Take the case of the Kassab brothers, who co-own through two holding companies a nondescript, outdoor parking lot also home to a flea market near downtown Jamaica, Queens. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
There was one privacy trial, Axon v Ministry of Defence, tried by Nicol J (judgment is awaited), one breach of confidence trial (Burrell v Clifford [2016] EWHC 294 (Ch)) and one privacy injunction (PJS  v News Group Newspapers). [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 2:56 pm by Giles Peaker
Nicholas v Secretary of State for Defence [2015] EWHC 4064 (Ch) (24 August 2015) Rose J. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:23 am
Via Katfriend Federica Pezza (LLM candidate, Queen Mary University of London) comes the news that yet another culinary IP battle is now taking place in a country where food indeed matters: Italy.* Where has the patent troll gone? [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
 We had an Inforrm post on the subject of whether the Queen is likely to obtain satisfaction from IPSO. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 3:24 am
Romito's pasta (left) v Sposito's pasta (right)Is there IP in culinary recipes? [read post]
12 Mar 2016, 8:23 am by Geoffrey
  Indeed, although Article V of the New York Convention 1958 creates a presumption that the foreign Court will respect a decision of the Court of the seat of an Award, the word “may” implies that there is no compulsion to do so. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:29 pm
  That the reforms taken by the CCP under the leadership of Deng Xiaoping produced socialist modernization with its emphasis on Socialist markets and economic activity does not make it any less ideological—unless one embraces the conceit that ideology must be as flamboyant as a drag queen on stage to merit serious attention. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 5:31 am by William J. Armstrong
Since Bhasin v Hrynew, 2014 SCC 71, courts have been applying  the “organizing principle” of good faith in all contractual relationships thereby delinating its scope in different cirucmstances. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 10:26 pm by Robert Chesney
How does the government’s request in the Queens iPhone case compare to its request in the San Bernadino case? [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
 The Court ruled that Mr Whatcott had failed to provide proof of actual malice on the part of the CBC, and that Court of Queen’s Bench Justice Richard Elson had made inferences based on “scant evidence. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Sir David Eady handed down judgment in Wasserman v Freilich. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:00 pm by Old Fox
Denounced by the Catholic queen Mary I for promotingProtestantism, he was convicted of heresy and burned at the stake.Early lifeCranmer was the second son of Thomas Cranmer and Agnes (née Hatfield). [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of B.C., 2015 BCCA 184 (36500) Constitutionality of provincial collective bargaining legislation. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 2:36 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
These directions derived from Chan Wing-Siu v The Queen [1985] 1 AC 168 and Regina v Powell and English [1999] 1 AC 1 and the Supreme Court and Privy Council had to decide whether the common law had taken a wrong turning in these cases. [read post]