Search for: "State v. Connor"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 2,536
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2010, 12:47 pm
Two of those decisions, Brown v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:50 am
”* Judge Ling-Cohan pointed out that in interpreting a similar statute, the Court of Appeals has held that the Commissioner of Education’s review powers over the decision of a hearing panel were broad and with regard to any punishment to be imposed, the Commissioner could substitute his own judgment for that of the panel, citing Mutter of Shurgin v Ambach, 56 NY2d 700 and Matter of Letyn v Ambach, 56 NY2d 912. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm
[i] Raimonde v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
United States, 17-7177 Issue: Whether, when a criminal defendant has already been convicted of an offense in a state criminal proceeding, the United States may thereafter prosecute the defendant for the same offense without violating the Fifth Amendment’s prohibition on double jeopardy. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 10:59 am
To the contrary, Jones indicates her agreement with the First Circuit that such an interest “is not the same as ‘mere moral disapproval of an excluded group’” – here the First Circuit is quoting Justice O’Connor’s concurrence in Lawrence v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 10:40 am
” County of Sacramento v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:11 pm
In Lindke v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:50 am
” Well, that last one really only applies to Phil Connors, but you get the idea. [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:39 am
See United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm
Expanding Presidential Influence on Agency Adjudication July 23, 2021 | Bijal Shah, Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law The Supreme Court’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 9:22 am
O'Connor v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
State v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:56 am
FergusonPlessy v. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 10:17 am
Connor and Plumhoff v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
It was a void agreement because EM's dad clearly knew that she lacked capacity (citing Hart v O'Connor [1985] AC 1000). [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:20 am
It was a void agreement because EM's dad clearly knew that she lacked capacity (citing Hart v O'Connor [1985] AC 1000). [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:47 am
See order in Texas v. [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Vilardo, of Connors & Vilardo, LLP, of Buffalo, represented the husband. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:19 pm
We have a wealth of varying viewpoints on AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
