Search for: "Supreme People's Court Observer"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 2,743
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2012, 5:18 am
"Our job is to represent people charged," said Terry MacCarthy, who ran the federal defender's office in Chicago for more than 40 years. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 5:18 am
"Our job is to represent people charged," said Terry MacCarthy, who ran the federal defender's office in Chicago for more than 40 years. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:08 am
I have written before that the Supreme Court confirmation process has become, in effect, a game. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Like many other observers, I think it’s likely the Court will hold that the questions the Colorado Supreme Court purported to answer about Donald Trump’s involvement in an insurrection and his eligibility to hold a future federal office are questions are reserved for federal decision-makers, and that the Court almost certainly won’t itself adjudicate whether Trump is eligible to be President. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 1:47 am
Perhaps not many people will have claims that bear consideration, but the Supreme Court is right to understand that those few who do should be able to press those claims beginning in the trial court.The case is remanded to the Court of Criminal Appeals to consider the defendant’s appeal of the denial of his amended motion for new trial. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 7:24 am
If written observations were made publicly available in the way that, for example, briefs to the US Supreme Court are, this kind of problem would not arise.I note that in his Opinion in Joined Cases C-514/07P, C-528/07P and C-532/07P ... [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 2:04 pm
And that, for all evangelical voters' focus on the Supreme Court and social issues such as abortion, was the real goal. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:02 am
I will do blog posts on all (the Internet Law works-in-progress post will be at Goldman's Observations). [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
* How much are Wikipedia's public domain photos worth? [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 6:57 am
’'” “The Court found that the issues were governed by the New Jersey Supreme Court’s opinion in In re State Grand Jury Investigation, 200 N.J. 481 (2009) because a non-party was paying for the defense. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:37 am
In the early 1990's there was concern in the UK that Anton Piller orders were overused and subject to abuse. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 6:30 am
[and] the right to have one's vote counted . . . and the right to put a ballot in a box. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 12:48 am
As they explain, "a majority agreed with the Court's resolution of the key issues, but within the sample there were sharp differences of opinion along cultural, ideological, and other lines. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 12:30 am
The fresh ruling in December 2016 issued by the Supreme People’s Court of China (SPC) on the “Michael Jordan” 4+ years legal battle has attracted great attention (see a Guest Kat report here). [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 3:01 am
The US Supreme Court ultimately deadlocked on whether the insider trading laws covered Winans' actions. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 1:58 pm
Supreme Court decision, under Title VII, an employer is not required to accommodate an employee's religious beliefs and practices if doing so would impose an “undue hardship” on the employer’s legitimate business interests. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:30 pm
A complacency that has not only continued since the Supreme Court of Canada has condemned it in the seminal case of R. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 4:22 pm
It would be the fifth in America this year, following the Supreme Court ruling in Baze v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 11:25 am
All this was literally true, in the sense that if Bork had been on the Court and had commanded a majority, major Supreme Court decisions such as Roe v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
Supreme Court have criticized that "bad law. [read post]
