Search for: "Sweet v. Sweet"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 1,646
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Select papers featured in the book address subjects such as unconscionability in clauses used to access adjudicative procedures for disputes; the recent destabilization of the law of unjust enrichment by the Supreme Court of Canada in Moore v Sweet, 2018 SCC 52; and how adverse possession both undermines property law and illuminates its social and communal nature. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:40 am
Meanwhile, the July 2010 issue of the Sweet & Maxwell monthly European Intellectual Property Review (EIPR) is also out, with a really important article by Christian Koenig and Ana Trias on the harmonisation of standard-setting procedures within and between the US and the EU. [read post]
25 May 2024, 10:39 am
” Sarkissian v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 6:51 pm
Lennox Lewis v Don King, [2004] EWCA Civ1329 (House of Lords, Supreme Court of Judicature). [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
In that closely-watched case, see slip opinion in Caperton v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:59 pm
In that closely-watched case, see slip opinion in Caperton v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 4:13 am
” FCC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:05 am
Based on precedent set by cases like Kelly v. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 4:48 pm
He sat as a First Tier Information Rights Tribunal Judge for ten years until retirement in 2017 and is the author of Celebrity and Royal Privacy, the Media and the Law (Sweet & Maxwell 2015). [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 3:54 am
The New York Times thought Chile’s effort to be pretty darn sweet. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:09 pm
He was backed by his son, George V, and was genial and enthusiastic. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 1:07 am
(L 199) 40 (EC) [4] Giuliano & Lagarde Report, sec. 4. [5] Ibid. [6] See Chapter I & Chapter II. [7] Report, sec. 4. [8] Ibid. [9] See Chapter I. [10] See Chapter I & Chapter III. [11] See Chapters V-VII. [12] See Chapter VIII. [13] Lawrence Collins (ed) Dicey, Morris and Collins on the Conflict of Laws (15th edn Sweet & Maxwell 2012) 2077. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 11:31 am
My sweet husband 34. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:55 am
A patent attorney with Beetz & Partner, Munich, he also has a very sweet smile (left). [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 4:56 am
Kinda sweet, benign, the girl-next-door thing. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 2:29 am
Categories can be identified/expanded: Reinhardt's decision in Sega v. [read post]
17 May 2008, 7:48 am
You are to go to the shops with Mummy and buy sweets at the best possible price and then re-sell them to your friends at the Saturday Club at a profit. [read post]
29 May 2014, 12:57 pm
Anonymous Free Speech v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 7:18 am
” Among other reasons, the information was derived solely from LinkedIn’s transactions with the plaintiffs and not from third parties, LinkedIn was not a “consumer reporting agency” under the Act, and the list of possible references was not, itself, used or intended to be used for an employment purpose (Sweet v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:07 am
London : Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reuters, 2012 xlv, 251 p. ; 22 cm. [read post]
