Search for: "Thomas v. Thomas et al"
Results 1341 - 1360
of 1,399
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2014, 1:11 pm
Lee et al., An Empirical and Consumer Psychology Analysis of Trademark Distinctiveness, 41 Ariz. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:18 pm
Thomas UniversityRafael Romeu, DevTech Systems; Trevor Alleyne and Sebastian Acevedo, IMF, "The Vacation is Over, 2016"Fred Viera, Esq., Trembly Law Firm, "The State of the U.S. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2013)In 2010, the faculty at Penn State Law approved the creation of a new concept course, to be named "Elements of Law". [read post]
6 May 2012, 11:52 am
(citing and quoting Thomas Starkie, et al., A Practical Treatise of the Law of Evidence and Digest of Proofs in Civil and Criminal Proceedings vol. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am
Thomas Dale Delay et al. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:55 pm
Winn, et al. (09-987) and Garriott v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
Thomas, 473 Pa. 193, 200-01, 3 [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 4:56 pm
., et al., v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm
Steel Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
As the postal case was wending its way through the courts in 2020, four experts in the reliability of software-based systems—Peter Ladkin, Bev Littlewood, Harold Thimbleby and Martyn Thomas— wrote of the case, "[F]or any moderately complex software-based computer system, such as the IT transaction-processing system Horizon ... it is a practical impossibility to develop such a system so that the correctness of every software operation is provable to the relevant standard in… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
As the postal case was wending its way through the courts in 2020, four experts in the reliability of software-based systems—Peter Ladkin, Bev Littlewood, Harold Thimbleby and Martyn Thomas— wrote of the case, "[F]or any moderately complex software-based computer system, such as the IT transaction-processing system Horizon ... it is a practical impossibility to develop such a system so that the correctness of every software operation is provable to the relevant standard in… [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:00 pm
In Marbury v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:49 pm
Bilski et al v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:01 pm
& Bus. 295 (2012); see also Thomas C. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Bruen, 597 U.S. 1, 36–37 (2022) (Thomas, J., for the majority of the Court); Bostock v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 11:18 am
Feldman et al. count patent monetizers corresponding to CKS categories 2 through 5, and 7. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto: “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:12 am
The following is our monthly featured post from Terry Nelson & Peter Fetzer of Foley & Lardner filling you in on the latest SEC developments. [read post]
