Search for: "United States v. Article of Drug" Results 1341 - 1360 of 2,497
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2014, 7:36 am by Jeff Welty
It’s uncharted territory, but I seriously doubt that pervasive and persistent surveillance of that nature comports with the Fourth Amendment as interpreted by the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am by Barry Sookman
Patents and Innovation – what the courts have said Justification for patents Article I, § 8, cl. 8, of the U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 11:29 am
  Procedural HistoryPlaintiff Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., (“Roche”) appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey granting the defendant generic drug companies summary judgment of invalidity as to claims 1-8 of U.S. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:24 am by Maureen Johnston
United States 13-744Issue: Whether a medical professional can be convicted of “knowingly and willfully” making a false statement in medical records or reports under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
” Second, the drug is neither prescribed by a doctor or psychiatrist nor dispensed by a pharmacist, and has not been studied in the United States to determine its interaction with other drugs. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 2:45 pm by Priscilla Smith
S 2000bb(b) (1).[3] Smith, 494 U.S. at 887 (equating evaluation of centrality with, inter alia, substantiality) (citing United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 7:50 am by Ruth Levush
The Court in that case confirmed the extradition of an Israeli national to the U.S. to stand trial on allegations of drug dealing involving the financing, export and distribution of 1.5 million pills of Methylenedioxythamphetamine (M.D.M.A, known also as Ecstasy) from Europe to the United States by operating multiple agents in various countries. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 11:14 am by Schachtman
  The Canadian court held that risk sufficed, and it went further, contrary to the majority of courts in the United States, to hold that a 40% reduction in risk sufficed to satisfy the more-likely-than-not standard. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 12:22 pm by Brenda Fulmer
Under current law, as confirmed by the United States Supreme Court in the Pliva v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:28 am by Yishai Schwartz
Remember the DC Circuit opinion in Aamer v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:04 am by Rory Little
§2:  “whoever … aids” an offense against the United States “is punishable as a principal. [read post]