Search for: "United States v. Moore" Results 1341 - 1360 of 1,602
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2012, 6:00 am by Will Bland
Recently this doctrine became the focus of attention in an interesting case from the United States District Court in Hawaii. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
In The Economist, Steven Mazie discusses the court’s decision this week in Moore v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 2:06 pm by Antoinette Konski
Supreme Court review is not warranted, and that if it is, the question for the Supreme Court is not whether human genes are patentable, but whether isolated DNA molecules that were identified and defined by human inventors are patent-eligible subject matter in the United States. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:50 pm
Additionally, both pre- and post- issuance opposition has long existed for United States trademarks. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
United States (Gray on Claims) CAFC: Orion v Hyundai on novelty: Expanding the scope of a printed publication with oral testimony (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: False marking includes marking with expired patent number: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 5:37 am by Michelle Buhalo
Supreme Court, New Amendment to Federal Rule of Evidence 902, New Title 34 in United States Code), offered tips and tricks to navigating member databases (Fastcase 7 Has Arrived, LexisNexis Digital Library New Multi-Volume Search Feature, Skip the Morning Paper with NewsBank), and pointed out specific titles available at Jenkins in both print and electronic formats (Corbin on Contracts, Drafting Patents for Litigation and Licensing, Social Media Law Resources). [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 10:37 pm
The song sold 13.2 million units (combined sales and track-equivalent streams), becoming the second best-selling song worldwide in 2014.Was there copying? [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 3:22 am by Ben
The song sold 13.2 million units (combined sales and track-equivalent streams), becoming the second best-selling song worldwide in 2014.Was there copying? [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 9:05 am by Jeff Gamso
*********On Tuesday, as you know, in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
A new challenge to the Ninth Circuit test could redefine the key meaning of “waters of the United States. [read post]