Search for: "-JAD GINGRICH"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 2,058
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2011, 7:20 am
But with self-exculpating philanderer because of “how passionately I felt about this country” Newt Gingrich now running for president, there’s still room on the commentating bench. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 6:52 am
Newt Gingrich, the former House speaker, and former Senator Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania want to dissolve the U.S. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:31 am
" http://j.mp/nIzjzf "Occupy Wall Street Fashion: Simon Doonan reviews the trends" http://j.mp/q99dXk good question: "Why computer voices are mostly female" http://j.mp/n58eYg "Newt Gingrich Continues the Michael Bayification of the Republican Party" http://j.mp/mUFJzU "An American Teen-ager in Yemen" http://j.mp/qnAdHV an interesting e-democracy idea: "The Citizens Foundation of Iceland: A Platform for… [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 12:21 pm
” Gingrich did not stop there, though. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 7:56 am
(with Gingrich, N.) [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 5:40 pm
.), Pizza CEO Herman Cain, Newt Gingrich, Ron Paul Rick Perry, Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 4:43 pm
The Hill recently reported that: [Newt] Gingrich also said that an education system that was teaching “really dumb ideas” was another cause of the current demonstrations. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 7:31 am
At Public Citizen’s Consumer Law & Policy Blog, Georgetown’s Brian Wolfman blogs about Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich, who recently indicated that, if elected, his Administration might decline to follow some of the Court’s precedents. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 3:10 am
In case you were wondering, the courts in a Gingrich Administration would not be a favored Branch. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 10:02 pm
(In return, of course, the courts don't deny Presidents much of what they want.)And then there's this, from Newt Gingrich, candidate for the Republican nomination for President, former Speaker of the House of Representatives. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:33 am
Debra Cassens Weiss of the ABA Journal reports on comments made by Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich, who recently indicated that he would “instruct the national security officials in a Gingrich administration to ignore the Supreme Court on issues of national security. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 4:37 am
Gingrich’s statement was indeed outrageous. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:00 pm
Gingrich called for making public all Federal Reserve decision documents from 2008-2010 and for firing Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 2:11 pm
Lagging in the Republican presidential race, candidate Newt Gingrich’s recent remarks about the judiciary can only be seen as a play for press. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 1:16 pm
After Newt Gingrich said at the presidential debate that Representative Barney Frank should be jailed, the congressman lobbed back with his own stinging statement. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:28 am
This morning on Morning Joe ex-conservative Joe Scarborough feigned outrage at Newt Gingrich’s suggestion in last night’s Republican debate that Democratic congressmen Barney Frank and Chris Dodd should be prosecuted for [...] [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 7:21 pm
I’ve noted the recent efforts of the New Hampshire House to “repudiate” a state Supreme Court advisory opinion that a bill they had put forth to compel the state’s AG join the anti-Obamacare lawsuits was unconstitutional (see here and here) Seeming to echo sentiments by Newt Gingrich on Sunday that (federal) judges should be compelled to testify before Congress and defend unpopular opinions (h/t Andrew Cohen at The Atlantic), the NH House GOP has release a post on… [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 4:14 pm
"Gingrich: Congress, president can ignore courts. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 7:39 am
Newt Gingrich: Roosevelt in 1942 about 12 Nazi spies: I will not honor a writ from the Supreme Court.Newt notes Kennedy is one person court. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:43 pm
Suburban Republicans revolted against the Gingrich Congress’ assault on the environment because their constituents didn’t like it. [read post]
