Search for: "Application of Johnson" Results 1361 - 1380 of 3,990
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2025, 10:00 am by Sherica Celine
House Speaker Mike Johnson has a goal of passing the bill in the House by Memorial Day (May 26) and sending it to President Trump by July 4, 2025. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
As held by the Court of Appeal in Rothmans, at para. 106, “the motion judge is not required to subject the pleadings to the scrutiny applicable on a rule 21 motion”. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 11:50 pm
But Linda Townsend Johnson and her husband, James Edward Johnson, testified at a hearing that they were removed erroneously within the 90-day period. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 11:28 am by John Elwood
§ 1396a(p), indicate that Congress clearly and unambiguously intended to create an implied private right of action to challenge a state’s determination that a provider is not “qualified” under the applicable state regulations. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 3:03 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
The facts of Matter of Soffici — where an investor purchased a Howard Johnson hotel and continued to run it as a Howard Johnson hotel— were not sufficient to establish a qualifying restructuring or reorganization. 22 I&N Dec. 158, 166 (Assoc. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 1:38 am by INFORRM
The application should made by part 23 application in existing proceedings and Part 8 proceedings where there are no existing proceedings. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 2:35 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
  If the application does not establish probable cause in the first place, the search is unconstitutional. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 9:16 am by Richard
The Legal Satyricon weighed in as well with an interesting post that uses the McDonalds application as a jumping-off point for a larger explanation of the patent process. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Dryden & Ors v Johnson Matthey Plc, heard 27-28 Nov 2017. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:06 am by Clay Hodges
  The reclassification of TVM to Class III will require manufacturers (such as Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, C.R. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:43 am
It is therefore insufficient: see Novartis AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 1039, [2011] ECC 10 at [77]. [read post]