Search for: "B. J. K."
Results 1361 - 1380
of 2,790
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
This request was ultimately denied by the Legal Board of Appeal (decision J 1/11), essentially because by the time the request for correction had been filed notice of the withdrawal had already been recorded in the European Patent Register (on February 6, 2009). [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
(b) Notwithstanding decision J 20/05, the purpose of a stay of the grant proceedings - namely to protect the rights of a person who claimed an entitlement - did not justify the legal consequence of refusing to process the application in suit as a divisional application after staying the proceedings in respect of the parent application. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:28 am
Friedman Mattia Fumanti Post-Soviet Social: Neoliberalism, Social Modernity, Biopolitics by Stephen J. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 3:06 pm
If it does infringe, then the position is the same as scenario (b): unclear. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 1:25 pm
(j) Fishing rights shall be deemed to be situated in the country in whose government's jurisdiction such rights are exercisable. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 12:58 pm
(j) A procedure to refer victims and perpetrators of bullying or harassment for counseling. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 4:26 pm
K. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am
Stuart Madden & Mary J. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
J 7/82 and T 428/98), the cause of non-compliance is removed on the date on which the person in charge of the patent application (in the present case: the duly authorised professional representative) realizes that the time limit has not been met. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:34 pm
b) If they weren’t, should India have banned endosulfan, invoking the precautionary principle? [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 1:48 pm
I review nine theories of civil liability: (a) battery, (b) informed consent, (c) negligence, (d) intentional infliction of emotional distress, (e) negligent infliction of emotional distress, (f) breach of contract, (g) health care decisions statutes, (h) POLST statutes, (i) Section 1983, and (j) the False Claims Act. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm
Weitz & Luxenberg P.C. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 2:22 pm
(b)1. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:15 am
In 2003,B. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
Consequently, although indicated as being “formulated according to the formulation of Example 1 of the patent”, the compositions used by the [opponent] in Annexes J, K and I are likely to differ from those employed in the patent in suit in more respects than only the copper corrosion inhibitor. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 2:36 pm
Aronson, Harvey B. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 12:45 pm
Pawlenko, Ph.D. of Catholic University, Richard J. [read post]
30 May 2013, 5:01 pm
In exceptional circumstances the appellant may of course decide to withdraw the appeal without filing a statement of grounds of appeal and before the time limit for doing so has expired, thus qualifying for the reimbursement of the appeal fee under R 103(1)(b). [read post]
23 May 2013, 12:18 pm
Para lograr esto se necesitaría recolectar mas datos: a. demográfica a lo largo de la vida de estas comunidades y de los subgrupos dentro de ellas, b. estructuras de soporte social que son parte fundamental de la salud mental de los individuos, c. inequidades en los cuidados de salud existentes en cada una de las comunidades y subgrupos, d. posibles intervenciones exitosas de salud que han sido desarrolladas en PR para estas poblaciones pero nunca han… [read post]
