Search for: "BR "
Results 1361 - 1380
of 2,897
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2021, 4:19 pm
” CrossAppellant Br. 64. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 12:46 pm
We congratulate Mirko Brüss for the birth of his third child, a baby boy named Friedrich: welcome! [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 8:54 am
Appellant’s Br. at 19. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 6:01 pm
Appellee’s Br. 27. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 1:39 pm
See Appellant’s Br. 55–57 (citing J.A. 2370–72). [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 9:22 am
” Appellees’ Br. at 33–34. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 9:13 am
See Br. at 10. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 4:00 am
[Br. 29] WC's brief opposing the appeal (read here) argued that §701's single reference to expulsion does not authorize judicial expulsion and "simply means that in the event an operating agreement provides for such expulsion, certain events might thereafter occur if a member is actually expelled pursuant to agreement" (Br. 34). [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:12 pm
Customs HTSUS Tariff Classification Pharmaceutical Appendix Import - Export Learned Hand Appeal from the United States Court of International Trade in No. 1:13-cv-00296-JCG. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 7:34 am
“…a growing list of countries outside the United States, including Canada, Australia, most European, and several South American countries, now recognize some form of multiclaimant litigationâ€â [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 12:54 pm
Les Plack, a dentist from Houston, took his family on a thrilling summer vacation to Baltimore, Maryland to fulfill his lifelong dream of visiting the National Museum of Dentistry. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 5:00 pm
Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice has affirmed the long-standing principle that you cannot sue for a free-standing violation of a statute. [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:06 am
As everyone is aware last year was an extremely difficult time for many attorneys (and law firms). [read post]
[Sasha Volokh] Can a state immunize its agencies from federal antitrust law through judicial review?
13 Sep 2016, 7:16 am
Appellants’ Br. at 46 (citing Tex. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:27 am
GuestKat Mirko Brüß reports on the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decision in BMG v Cox - when does an ISP lose its safe harbour protection? [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 4:48 pm
(See Clmt's Br. at 2 n.1 (Claimants "do not ask the Court to rely on emails" they attach); 13 (Claimants "do not ask the Court to rely on materials" they go on to discuss at length).) [read post]
10 May 2020, 12:20 pm
The IPKat has received news from former GuestKat Mirko Brüß of an interesting Austrian decision tackling the scope of intermediary injunctions. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 10:43 am
Two further CJEU referrals on YouTube’s ‘active role’ by Mirko BrüßThe more, the merrier. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 1:39 pm
” Appellant’s Br. at 28. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 10:45 am
Br. 14-15.) [read post]
