Search for: "Brown v. Harms"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 1,684
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2008, 8:08 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, February 07, 2008 US v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
Sec’y, Dep’t of Corr., in which Pryor, writing for eight judges, over two dissents, affirmed the district court’s conclusion that there was no Strickland violation due to counsel’s decision not to present mitigating evidence that would have been more harmful than helpful, and Wilson v. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 10:18 am
” As Charlie Brown would say, “Sigh. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 10:14 am
Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 4:42 am
Brown v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:01 pm
Corey Brettschneider & Nelson TebbeLast week, the Court heard arguments in Walker v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 8:24 am
" A former governor here became a US senator who was a leader of the "massive resistance" movement against Brown v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:32 am
Brown (2011). [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 6:54 am
Can be considered in child custody (See Brown v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:39 am
Can be considered in child custody (See Brown v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
She recalls Pauli Murray, the unknown yet brilliant lawyer whose paper on the Civil War amendments helped other lawyers litigate Brown v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 9:01 pm
As the Court made clear in Brown v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 10:42 am
United States v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:17 am
In Smith v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
§ 1983 in the absence of a government policy that causes the alleged harm? [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Federation and Secession, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 12:16 am
Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 150, 156). [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
Gordon College v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am
” He gives the example of finding common ground to oppose discrimination based on its harmful effects without labeling what motivates people to discriminate. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:01 am
In AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
