Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 1361 - 1380 of 16,690
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2018, 5:49 am
The author, who previously has addressed the use of European human rights and trade law in investor-state arbitrator, reviews the pros and cons of this particular kind of ‘boundary crossing. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 4:30 am by Peter J. Sluka
  The United States District Court for the Southern District of California wasn’t buying it (JAE Properties, Inc. v AMTAX Holdings 2001-XX, LLC, 3:19-CV-02075 [SD Cal Feb. 9, 2024]). [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE UPPER DECK COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Appellants, v.ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 12:45 am by INFORRM
In Galloway v William Frederick Frazer, Google Inc t/a YouTube and others, Mr Justice Horner in the High Court of Northern Ireland refused an application by Google Inc. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:33 am
Today, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) heard oral arguments in Arizona v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 5:07 am by David Kris
The government’s long-awaited proposal for addressing cross-border data requests, in the form of draft legislation, is finally here. [read post]
11 May 2009, 4:11 am
"The Wisconsin Court of Appeals stated that the legality of a stop must be taken as a whole. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 3:48 pm by Unknown
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (Medicare Like Rates)United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:41 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cisco Systems, Inc. cross-appeals the district court’s award of attorney fees and expenses. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 8:32 pm by Florian Mueller
But above all, it's a chance for three dozen U.S. states, Epic Games, Match Group, and the consumer class-action plaintiffs to argue that an adverse inference is warranted (or, as a fallback position, a curative instruction).If not for the Epic Games v. [read post]