Search for: "D&S, Inc." Results 1361 - 1380 of 26,048
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In Voxtel, Inc., ASBCA No. 60129 (March 9, 2023), the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) issued a decision that presents a primer on the resolution of indirect cost rate disputes. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 1:26 pm by Morgan Cloud
This analysis follows from the Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
For reasons persuasively stated in the petition for a writ of certiorari, that holding conflicts with this Court's decision in Bantam Books, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 4:21 am
Sun Precautions, Inc., Cancellation No. 92072352 (April 18, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Jonathan Hudis). [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 1:20 pm by Marcia Delgadillo
We’d also like to highlight the promotion of Frank J. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
Safelite Fulfillment, Inc. d/b/a Safelite AutoGlass, Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-00887-LY, in U.S. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:28 am by Florian Mueller
For instance, the PI motion must show an "immediate" danger, but then the analysis of other aspects will be less elaborate.The class-action lawyers--potentially with help from their Sony-counsel friends--now know Microsoft's "no irreparable harm" argument (which was foreseeable from the beginning: even if the gamers were right, they'd just have to buy an Xbox (half of them already own one) and pay a little more for games and subscription services,… [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
Anadarko Minerals, Inc. and A&S Mineral Development Co., LLC (Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Economic Development) Interest of M.S.P. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 6:23 am by Dan Bressler
” “In the Coca-Cola case, the company says it only found out about the conflict when two associates representing SuperCooler alerted Coke’s outside counsel that they’d been hired by Paul Hastings and would be changing their information on the docket. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 1:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Slack Techs., Inc., 13 F.4th 940, 949 (9th Cir. 2021) (quoting 15 U.S.C. [read post]