Search for: "Doe v. Baker" Results 1361 - 1380 of 1,837
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"Citing Baker v Poughkeepsie City School District, 18 NY3d 714, the court said that “[a]lthough a particular individual's involvement or participation in the disciplinary process does not automatically compel his or her recusal, the case law makes clear that "individuals who are personally or extensively involved in the disciplinary process should disqualify themselves from reviewing the recommendations of a Hearing Officer and from acting on the… [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 4:32 am by David J. DePaolo
The Appellate Division of the Board affirmed, and McRae then sought judicial review in superior court, which likewise upheld the decision of the ALJ.McRae appealed from the judgment of the superior court and argued that the Act does not compel her to authorize her treating physician to communicate ex parte with representatives of her employer, and that her right to medical privacy is protected by both Georgia law and the Privacy Rule of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability… [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm by law shucks
Finally, there was the Google/YouTube v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 5:36 pm by Amy Howe
He conceded that the court does not normally decide constitutional questions when it does not have to. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am by Guest Blogger
  The bakers all turned down the jobs on the grounds that the message sent by the proposed cakes was offensive or hateful. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:04 am by John Elwood
  Four amici were involved at the cert stage—including former Judge Michael McConnell for the Becket Fund and another Supreme Court practitioner with an equal number of consecutive double letters in his name, Baker Botts’s Aaron Streett. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 7:34 am by David Post
Regarding Section 230, as co-blogger Stuart Baker has already noted,  the Court has agreed to review the 9th Circuit's decision in Gonzalez v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
(Docket Report) (Gray on Claims) District Court S D Illinois: False Marking: ‘The Court does not need to be notified every time a judge makes a decision in one of those cases’: Mudge v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:44 am by Charon QC
” In relation to the law, Peter Jackson J had the benefit of Baker J’s comprehensive survey of the law relating to withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining treatment in W v M and others [2011] EWHC 2443 (COP). [read post]