Search for: "Does 1-29"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 12,901
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2014, 11:08 am
Nor does he argue that the fees are unrelated to the costs of conducting the background checks. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 7:02 am
(citing 29 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 2:40 pm
Claims 1 and 6 of the granted patent read as follows:"1. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:14 am
Id. at *1. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 1:31 am
Hartfourd Courantby Dan HaarJanuary 29, 2009A guy climbs up a ladder to fix his roof, falls off and breaks his leg, then does the same thing again a few years later. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 1:06 pm
Does it matter if the decision to deny was based on wrong facts because an inadequate investigation was made? [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 10:14 am
How Does Your State Rank on Sales Taxes? [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:40 am
Scott submitted a proposal using USPS Priority Mail Express (1-day service). [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 8:42 am
Common position of the African Union (2024) Contents 1 Introduction2 Applicability of international law3 Sovereignty4 Due diligence5 Prohibition of intervention6 Peaceful settlement of disputes7 Use of force8 Attribution9 International humanitarian law (jus in bello)10 International armed conflict11 Non-international armed conflict12 Conduct of hostilities13 Attacks against persons14 Proportionality15 Specially protected persons, objects and activities (international… [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 12:56 pm
In the complaint, there are causes of action for: 1. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 1:35 am
The range did not therefore result from an arbitrary selection.The range indicated in claim 1 was also narrow compared to the possible range for the device shown in figure 1 of E1.The range had to be appreciated also in combination with feature 3 of claim 1 which recited: "an electric power storage device (20) connected to the terminals in parallel with the fuel cell". [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 1:00 am
Does work/life balance vary by region? [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 2:01 am
Even if no sale or actual delivery of infringing goods actually occurred, the fact that the consumers were invited, by targeted advertising, to acquire ownership of the original or copy of the work in question, would suffice to trigger application of Article 4(1).What does this ruling mean? [read post]
25 Mar 2018, 8:10 pm
It does not, Judge Lawrence said, preclude coverage for the costs incurred in defending the COF suits. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 11:45 am
"Does Social Cohesion Solve Forced Migration Riddles? [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 8:13 am
Reply comments will be due by November 29. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 3:46 am
There were differences — judges here threw out 1 in 21 cases, while the rate in Toledo was 1 in 27, and in Pittsburgh in in 45. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 2:18 am
3) Should Article 5 of the [InfoSoc] Directive (Directive 2001/29/EC) be interpreted as meaning that there is no “lawful use” within the meaning of Article 5(1)(b) of that Directive if a temporary reproduction is made by an end user during the streaming of a copyright-protected work from a third-party website where that copyright-protected work is offered without the authorisation of the right holder(s)? [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 3:46 am
3) Should Article 5 of the [InfoSoc] Directive (Directive 2001/29/EC) be interpreted as meaning that there is no “lawful use” within the meaning of Article 5(1)(b) of that Directive if a temporary reproduction is made by an end user during the streaming of a copyright-protected work from a third-party website where that copyright-protected work is offered without the authorisation of the right holder(s)? [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 6:03 am
Does the brief gloss to July 2010 news amount to putting lipstick on a pig? [read post]