Search for: "Does 1-58"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 2,966
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2018, 6:18 pm
(Art. 1 ¶¶1-2, 4). [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 10:57 pm
Greg Lambert 1:56 Caroline. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 5:57 pm
My own earlier essays may be accessed here: Cuba Sonic Weapons Affair (43) 0:01 a retired marine officer who work for nine years as a NATO civilian that Allied command transformation before transitioning to private practice and 0:07 consultancy he has a JD from Maryland law an llm from Harvard Law and an MSS 0:12 MSC from the University of Oxford he resides in nor North for Virginia 0:18 hey I also have have a new I have a new job I started two weeks ago… [read post]
12 May 2017, 11:39 am
.: Ok we’ll imam [sic] finished what I just started before I said hey MJ @ 12:58 a.m.: what do you mean? [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 10:53 pm
It does not mean we are back to business as usual. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 4:14 am
The agency’s conditional sailing order (CSO) was set to expire this weekend, on November 1, 2021, but was just extended to January 13, 2022. [read post]
20 May 2011, 6:40 am
Sign No. 1: The person who fired you is the same person who hired you not too long ago. [read post]
17 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
Vallières, 2020 QCCA 372; 2022 SCC 10 (39162) The discretion conferred on courts by s. 462.37(3) of the Criminal Code does not allow them to limit the amount of a fine in lieu to the profit made from criminal activity. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 1:15 am
Does the enactment of s 123 mean that principle is no longer applicable? [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:14 pm
It does so from the perspective of the initial encounter with the enormity of the pandemic. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
John Doe summonses. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:00 am
Pfister also testified based on published data that the 5-year survival rate for women with Stage 1 cervical cancer is 80-90% and that the 5-year survival rate for women with 2B cervical cancer is 58%. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 10:21 am
" in TTAB 2(d) Bake-Off Precedential No. 5: TTAB Reverses 2(d) Refusal Due to Weakness of Marks and Differences in Goods Precedential No. 4: Petitioner's Prior Use Analogous to Trademark Use Leads to TTAB Cancellation of "THE CRAFTSMAN ALS IK KAN" Registrations Precedential No. 2: Finding Door Hardware and Toilets Related, TTAB cancels "DEVONSHIRE" Registration Citable No. 1: Finding Hotels and Casinos Related, TTAB Grants 2(d) Summary Judgment in "CABANA… [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
According to the author of the dataset, the capital expenditures variable is cumulated capital spending from the cash flow statements of firms and does not generally include acquisitions. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 10:37 pm
Lord Wilson emphasised that, although foreign judgments may, in some cases, be refused on grounds of public policy, recognition will not be refused lightly: “a court’s recognition of a foreign order under private international law does not depend on any arrogant attempt on that court’s part to mark the foreign court’s homework” (at [58]). [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:11 am
Second, if a community air monitoring program does not comply with the Act, its data cannot be “used, disclosed, or disseminated” by LDEQ to: (1) Issu[e] a fine, penalty, or violation against any person, including the owner or operator of a stationary source [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 9:07 pm
Co., 58 AD3d 990, 991 [2009]; Kokonis v Hanover Ins. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 12:45 pm
Generally speaking, appendices to the report should be streamlined, and only include what is necessary for the formulation of the expert’s opinion and/or the facts and assumptions upon which it is based. [30] An appendix containing summaries and comments, to the extent that it does not contain an opinion or underlying facts and assumptions, is no more than a working paper which does not need to be included in the report… [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:37 am
The Schedule was a temporary “kludge” hastily put together in the last few months between the passage of SB899 and the mandated Schedule adoption date of 1/1/2005. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 2:40 pm
The maximum penalty for these two offences is a fine of HK$1 million and imprisonment for five years. [read post]
