Search for: "Edwards v. Means" Results 1361 - 1380 of 1,960
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2012, 11:15 am by Sean Minahan
  The court’s entire decision can be found at Edwards Aquifer Authority v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 5:24 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Episode title has dual meaning: Will's suspension and the case of a suicide jumpers from a bridge and a film about the suicides. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:54 am by Rob Robinson
 bit.ly/zwruTK (Ron Friedmann) Cost of Converting (Electronically Stored Information) Jardin v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:28 pm by John McFarland
The Texas Supreme Court issued its opinion today in Edwards Aquifer Authority v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:16 am by Susan Brenner
Accordingly, the PowerPoint was clearly a reasonably necessary or appropriate means of maintaining an accurate knowledge of PPD's official activities within the meaning of § 39–121. . . . [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:51 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
"At UT, they have a very successful race-neutral means, which has proven to be a better avenue for increasing diversity," said [Edward] Blum, referring to the top 10 percent law. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 11:43 pm by INFORRM
On their ordinary meaning these words were surely capable of covering criminal allegations made against the Editor personally. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:15 am by Laura Sandwell
BAI Ltd v Thomas Bates and Son Ltd, BAI Ltd v Durham, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance Company and Adur District Council and Ors, Independent Insurance Company Ltd v Fleming and Anor, Municipal Mutual Insurance Company v Zurich Insurance Company and Ors, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Edwards, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Akzo Nobel UK Ltd and Excess… [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
The latter was the High Court appeal of a Doncaster Magistrates’ Court decision to prosecute Paul Chambers for an offence under section 127 of the Communications Act 2003, sending a message of a menacing character by means of a public electronic communications network. [read post]
He stated that the judgments in Johnson and Eastwood v Magnox Electric plc; Cornwall County Court v McCabe [2004] UKHL 35  both recognised that provisions in the ERA did not supersede an employee’s common law and contractual rights and he allowed the appeal. [read post]