Search for: "I v. B"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 24,517
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2016, 12:15 pm
§ 271(b). [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 6:00 am
I've had more time to read the majority and concurring opinions in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 2:45 pm
I, § 8, cl. 4. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 10:27 am
Associates v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 1:53 pm
I think the Law Court got things wrong recently, in State v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 1:29 pm
Federal Rule of Evidence 803(8)(B) (like most state counterparts) provides an exception to the rule against hearsay for Records, reports, statements, or data compilations, in any form, of public offices or agencies, setting forth...matters observed pursuant to duty imposed by... [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 8:23 am
This morning, I had the distinct pleasure of presenting alongside Chicago civil rights attorney Linda Friedman on two cases about which I've written before: McReynolds v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 8:00 am
Stuart Chinn, University of Oregon School of Law, has posted The Ideology Behind Brown v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Blueford v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
I. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
I. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 3:17 pm
"Technically, the point was that Article 12(1) (b) of the Brussels II bis Regulation speaks of the jurisdiction being "accepted expressly or otherwise in an unequivocal manner … at the time the court is seised", and the court first seised in any matter relating to parental responsibility was the court in Marbella, when the father issued his application there.Commentary: I agree entirely with their Lordships. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 8:11 am
Palomar Medical Center v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:16 am
City of Canton v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am
See Sonja B. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 9:03 pm
The dissent was joined by Justice Sotomayor (Parts I-IV), but not the more controversial Section V. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 7:03 am
§ 52.21(b)(23)(i). [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:10 am
From a letter BY Robert Merges TO the CAFC on 28 April 2010:At the request of TiVo’s counsel, I am writing to offer some additional information related to the amicus filing I submitted on Monday in TiVo v. [read post]
