Search for: "In Re: Does v." Results 1361 - 1380 of 30,597
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2019, 12:26 pm
  When you're dealing with what seems like a routine thing -- a hardship request -- I doubt whether the grand jurors think that having the prosecutor say "That's fine, you're excused" is anything more than a pure administrative function. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:31 am
  But it's not a felony to possess it, at least if you're 21 and it's under an ounce.There is, in fact, a strong argument that that's exactly what the text of the statute provides.So why does the California Supreme Court basically have to grant review? [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 3:16 pm
 In California, yes, you have a right to be told why you're being arrested. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 2:01 pm
Everything that Judge Callahan says and does here is exactly right. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 4:42 am by Jon Hyman
According to the order issued by a Massachusetts trial court judge in KNF&T Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am by AIDAN WILLS MATRIX
Returning to Khuja, the majority took the view that A v BBC turned on very particular facts and did not represent a departure from the approach taken in Re S  and Re Guardian News and Media, which was endorsed in A v BBC [28]. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:01 am by Andrew Hamm
” Sessions was referring to 2015’s Johnson v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 12:10 pm
At least for devoted court-watchers (and -readers) such as myself.So what does yesterday bring? [read post]