Search for: "In Re Grand Jury"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 2,791
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2014, 8:13 am
“Butch” Dickson, 58, Jackson, Mississippi, was indicted by a federal grand jury on April 8, 2014, on six counts of bankruptcy fraud, six counts of bank fraud, and five counts of wire fraud for relocated his businesses to Panama and Costa Rica and instructing his customers to submit their monthly mortgage payments to addresses in Las Vegas, Nevada, and Miami, Florida. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 4:59 am
He may well have, and Fleming complained in a subsequent 440.10 motion that he wanted to testify in the grand jury but his lawyer wouldn’t let him. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 7:43 pm
Assuming that the contempt charge gets through the House (and that’s a huge assumption), the matter would then move to a grand jury. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:00 am
In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 2014 WL 541216 (CTA3 Feb. 12, 2014). [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:00 am
In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 2014 WL 541216 (CTA3 Feb. 12, 2014). [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 5:15 pm
Defendant factually admitted he sold narcotics, and that guilty plea remains part of the overall record in this case, The evidence before the Court, and presumably the grand jury, shows that after working with an accomplice under the age of sixteen, defendant accepted "pre-recorded buy money" from a police officer posing as a customer, and then personally handed narcotics to that officer. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
The government's need for the secrecy of the grand jury proceedings is protected by temporarily restraining Twitter from divulging any information about the underlying grand jury subpoena until after this Court issues a final ruling in this matter. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 8:20 pm
§ 2705(b) for Grand Jury Subpoena #GJ2014032122836 (D.D.C. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 8:35 am
The film, which won the SXSW Grand Jury Award for documentary features, makes the case that the disaster’s effects still linger for many, even if media attention has waned. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:59 am
It’s the assumption that anyone who was weaned on ham sandwiches from the grand jury can’t possibly be fair or do right? [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 9:34 pm
Steve mentioned the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's opinion in In re Thirty-Third Statewide Investigating Grand Jury, --- A.3d ---- (2014), which joins other courts in rejecting a privilege assertion by a state agency in response to a grand jury subpoena. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 9:37 pm
Khan was indicted by a federal grand jury on December 6, 2012. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 8:37 pm
Since everyone loves a conspiracy, why not convene a grand jury to inquire into an ongoing conspiracy to suppress evidence? [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 3:23 pm
In view of the foregoing, the indictment was dismissed with leave to re-present to a New York County Grand Jury, to the extent that the People can establish jurisdiction, or, alternatively, for re-presentation before a Bronx County Grand Jury. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 7:53 am
In In Re: Grand Jury Subpoena, No. 13-1237 (3d Cir. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 11:49 am
Once you’re charged, then you’re facing prosecution for jail or prison time and fines. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 8:39 am
So, for instance, a criminal defendant can testify before the grand jury or at a preliminary hearing but refuse to testify at trial. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 4:39 pm
Such a view would be unrealistic despite the recognition that some of the provisions of the Bill of Rights (entitlement to bail, indictment by a grand jury, public trial or trial by jury) would not be applicable in the Family Court. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:20 am
Courts of Appeals Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2014cta.htmlIn re Grand Jury Proceedings (tribal sovereign immunity, subpoena) Klamath Claims Committee v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:53 am
The only question is whether the Kaleys are constitutionally entitled to a judicial re-determination of the conclusion the grand jury already reached: that probable cause supports this criminal prosecution (or alternatively put, that the prosecution is not "baseless," as the Kaleys believe, supra, at 5). [read post]
