Search for: "Jones v. People"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 2,170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2010, 6:50 pm
In non-nomination news: The cross in the Mojave dessert that was at the center of the recent Supreme Court decision in Salazar v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 7:15 am
Under the Supreme Court decision in Lexecon Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 11:14 am
And he brought up Helvering v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 8:54 am
Most people feel so strongly about the issue that they can’t unwind their views of the law from their personal beliefs. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:19 pm
[Then there’s no point in requiring people to use one rather t [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 10:31 am
”) Jones v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:45 pm
A recent decision by the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in Downey v. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 11:40 pm
Cited Madge v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 11:53 am
Liebeck v. [read post]
15 May 2010, 9:34 am
Kaui Jochanan Amsterdam v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 12:27 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:36 am
Supreme Court, in Shinn v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
”[7] Judges charged with making these custody decisions “rarely received the expert testimony of native people who could familiarize [them] with traditional child-rearing practices,” but instead relied upon the testimony of non-Indian social workers who were ignorant of the ways and traditions of Native Americans.[8] These social workers often advised courts that the abject poverty of many Indian families prevented them from properly parenting their… [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 5:04 pm
Mondaire Jones. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 11:57 am
Okay, everybody else, all eight other people or all seven or eight people? [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 6:16 pm
” Sanders v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 9:24 pm
But I don’t believe that a judge’s primary focus should be the answer to the question “So, defendant Jones, if I were to set bail here, what can you afford to pay? [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 9:30 am
These two decisions are Faverty v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:48 am
Jones (9-0): Defendant’s conviction was vacated because a GPS device was attached to his car and used to monitor his movements. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 6:33 am
 Ashby Jones of the WSJ Law Blog explains how the league will work: “[Y]ou pick the way you think the Supreme Court will rule on its docket. [read post]
