Search for: "Kelly v. Kelly" Results 1361 - 1380 of 3,174
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2005, 4:35 am
Similarly that case can substantiate Google's claim that only selective pages of digitised books will be made available online for users to view and read.In my view, Kelly v Arriba does not provide Google with a rock solid defence. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 6:53 pm
    WC I Waste Conversion Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am by Public Employment Law Press
" As the court held in Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, "an injury-causing event is accidental when it is sudden, unexpected and not a risk of the work performed, but the focus of the determination must be on the precipitating cause of [the] injury, rather than on the petitioner's job assignment. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Kelly v Levin, 81 AD2d 1005, the court ruled that acquitting an employee in an administrative disciplinary action based on the same charges underlying the individual's  criminal conviction was a reversible error because the standard of proof in the criminal action was greater. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division concurred with the Supreme Court’s ruling noting that “The giving of false statements in the course of an official investigation has been upheld as a ground for dismissal from municipal employment," citing Duncan v Kelly, 43 AD3d 297, affirmed 9 NY3d 1024.As the United States Supreme Court held in Bryson v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am by Public Employment Law Press
" As the court held in Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, "an injury-causing event is accidental when it is sudden, unexpected and not a risk of the work performed, but the focus of the determination must be on the precipitating cause of [the] injury, rather than on the petitioner's job assignment. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, the Court of Appeals held that "For the purpose of Retirement and Social Security Law, the applicant bears the burden of establishing that the disability was the result of an accident, which is defined as "a sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact". [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am by Public Employment Law Press
" As the court held in Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, "an injury-causing event is accidental when it is sudden, unexpected and not a risk of the work performed, but the focus of the determination must be on the precipitating cause of [the] injury, rather than on the petitioner's job assignment. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 5:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, the Court of Appeals held that "For the purpose of Retirement and Social Security Law, the applicant bears the burden of establishing that the disability was the result of an accident, which is defined as "a sudden, fortuitous mischance, unexpected, out of the ordinary, and injurious in impact". [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:03 am by Public Employment Law Press
" As the court held in Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, "an injury-causing event is accidental when it is sudden, unexpected and not a risk of the work performed, but the focus of the determination must be on the precipitating cause of [the] injury, rather than on the petitioner's job assignment. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 3:40 am
The court said that it is well established that courts must uphold the disciplinary penalty imposed by an appointing authority unless, as a law, it is an abuse of discretion, citing Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32. [read post]