Search for: "Lynch v. State" Results 1361 - 1380 of 1,528
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: ECJ gives Copad ruling on exhaustion and luxury goods; interpretation of Article 8(2) leads to new questions: Copad SA v Christian Dior couture SA, Vincent Gladel, as liquidator of Société industrielle lingerie (Class 46) (IPKat) China’s biggest ever patent dispute comes to a multi-million dollar end:… [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
So far, the decisions have validated the party’s state-by-state legal strategy and offered a reprieve from several Republican gerrymandering attempts before a single election could be held under the new lines. [read post]
10 Oct 2012, 8:44 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
  Last Monday, the United States Supreme Court denied a writ of certiorari to review the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals’ ruling in McReynolds v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
  Only in one instance have the Plaintiffs possibly stated a colorable claim. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 2:43 am
Even as long ago as 1980 we felt it proper to 599 "assume" that unlawful police behavior would "be dealt with appropriately" by the authorities, United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 8:39 am
(IP Dragon) (ContentAgenda)   Europe Study by Institute of European Media Law: Blanket licence for non-commercial copies needed (Intellectual Property Watch)   France French Parliament passes 3-strikes HADOPI law (Ars Technica) (Media Wonk) (TorrentFreak) (IPKat) (Out-Law) (Intellectual Property Watch) (TorrentFreak) (Ars Technica) (ContentAgenda) France to block Pirate Bay (TorrentFreak) AdWords: French first instance court condemns the advertiser: Onixxa v… [read post]
26 Feb 2006, 8:17 am by ACS
., said his state's many fees, known there as add-ons, were a backdoor way to make poor people pay for the free lawyers guaranteed to them by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Gideon v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:30 am by Wahab & Medenica LLC
Lynch Comm’n Sys., 638 A.2d, 1110, 1120-21 (Del. 1994) [read post]