Search for: "MUSIC v. STATE"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 4,606
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2017, 1:42 pm
The video also uses iconic music from both Game of Thrones and the Star Wars franchises. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 9:10 am
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569 [4] CCA & B, LLC., v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 10:04 pm
" [the court’s emphasis]The Honda court stated (paragraph 47), with reference to the above passage, that it is apparent that acquiescence no longer forms part of our law. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 8:46 am
Broadcast Music, Inc. and United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 9:03 am
Fairness to deceased’s estates about benefiting from use v. other people w/no connection.Amy Maggs: Central staff/drafter. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm
105 S.Ct. 2218 85 L.Ed.2d 588 HARPER & ROW, PUBLISHERS, INC. and the Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., Petitionersv.NATION ENTERPRISES and the Nation Associates, Inc. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 1:09 am
Many foreign nationals who have immigrated abroad yearn for a piece of home, either through food, music or TV and movies. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 2:00 pm
In Lutz v. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 7:25 am
Nourse LJ defined it as "a work of action, with or without words or music, which is capable of being performed before an audience”. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 6:20 am
The panel discussion was on the doctrine of equivalents following the Actavis v Lilly decision. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:16 pm
The case is Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 2:00 pm
For the children, many states continue to have indefensibly short SOLs. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
Barnes v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 9:52 am
Seuss Enters. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 5:49 am
However, it is unclear how far this right of integrity could be stretched in the context of performances; a restrictive approach has been followed in the context of authorial works (see Pasterfield v Denham [1999] FSR 168, Confetti Records v Warner Music UK Ltd [2003] EWHC 1274 (Ch), Harrison v Harrison [2010] FSR 25, compare with Tidy v Trustees of the Natural History Museum (1995) 39 IPR 501).It is not at all… [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:03 am
Since its inception in 2015, gaming has become the second largest category on YouTube after music with nearly 77M subscribers. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 5:09 pm
See Maple Leaf Broadcasting v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 2:14 pm
The case is Muhammad Ali Enterprises LLC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:12 am
This provides the opportunity for the UK to retain cultural goods that have been deemed to be of outstanding national importance[6] that would otherwise be exported, thus providing a balancing act, insofar as it is possible, between protecting national treasures in the public interest; private property rights; and the position and reputation of the UK as an international art market.[7] The Waverley Criteria In relation to whether an object could potentially be deemed a ‘national… [read post]
