Search for: "N.Y. Supreme Court" Results 1361 - 1380 of 3,454
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2015, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” Reed appealed the Supreme Court’s ruling but the Appellate Division affirmed the lower court decision, noting that the charges filed against Reed were supported by adequate evidence showing that she had failed to plan and execute lessons, as observed on multiple enumerated dates. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:50 pm by Sean Wajert
The Supreme Court reversed, holding that impossibility preemption barred the plaintiff's claims. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 5:57 am by Lyle Denniston
It cited a 1937 Supreme Court ruling in the case of Frad v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 7:05 am by Robert Natelson (guest-blogging)
During the 1960s, the Council of State Governments, unhappy with the legislative reapportionment decisions of the Earl Warren Supreme Court, promoted a trio of corrective amendments. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 6:16 am
Fediuk, 66 N.Y.2d 881, 883 [Court ofAppeals of New York 1985], quoting Matter of Vanderbilt [Rosner–Hickey], 57 N.Y.2d 66, 73 [Court of Appeals of New York 1982]). [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 5:21 pm
A Kings Estate Administration Lawyer said that, in another case, an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department (241 App. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 9:59 am by Lyle Denniston
The Clerk’s office at the Supreme Court promptly returned the application to Gura, saying that the application did not comply with the Court’s rules. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:20 pm by Gallivan & Gallivan
The New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department reversed a trial court order for summary judgment in favor of the defendant driver in a pedestrian car accident case. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 8:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
After examinations before trial and a review of documentary evidence, Supreme Court determined that the applications were improperly denied, annulled the county and village decisions and granted the applications. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 1:00 pm by Ray Dowd
The New York State Supreme Court Justice hearing the case concluded that the painting had not been abandoned because it did not constitute “a voluntary relinquishment of a known right. [read post]