Search for: "Sellers v. United States"
Results 1361 - 1380
of 1,425
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2010, 2:44 pm
Weekly D342aContracts -- Home construction -- Retention of purchase deposit after buyer cancelled due to delay that was neither party's fault -- Consumer law -- Section 501.1375, which requires a building contractor or developer to hold certain deposits of a prospective buyer of a one- or two-family residential dwelling unit in an escrow account unless the buyer waives the escrow requirements in writing, does not apply to general contractor who contracts to build single-family… [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
Agard, Debtor, Chapter 7 The Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of New York The Judge: The Honorable Robert E. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
It was estimated by The Chronicle of Philanthropy that $246.9 million was raised from donors in the United States in the first month following the disaster. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 2:38 pm
., public charities and private foundation – formed in the United States are eligible to receive tax-deductible charitable contributions. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 9:31 am
And the dollar, particularly in the United States, has market power. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 6:53 pm
United States, 116 S. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:24 am
Pest Control will authenticate a Banksy already owned or will work with buyers and sellers to authenticate an item that is in the process of being sold.[30] As is Banksy’s way, the authentication is done in rather clever ways. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm
However, the explanatory notes to the Act indicate that the new defence is intended to reflect the common law as set out in Flood v Times Newspapers [2012] UKSC 11, in which Lord Mance stated that it would seldom be in the public interest “…to publish material which has not been the subject of responsible journalistic enquiry and consideration. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 7:42 am
Safa Enterprises Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 3:26 pm
These factors together, the Judge said, “support an inference that [the plaintiff’s] alleged securities purchase occurred inside the United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 11:49 am
He further ordered the prosecutors to review those memoranda and promptly turn over to the defense any material under Brady v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am
Instead, he agrees with the logic and methodology approved in Matter of Murphy (United States Dredging Corp.), 74 AD3d 815 (2d Dept 2010) (read here my post on Murphy), requiring a present value computation of the gains taxes to be paid at a projected future date, here, at the end of the assumed 10-year holding period. [read post]
16 May 2018, 3:00 am
Another study by economists at the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) found that domestic and foreign corporations paid $3.2 trillion in total taxes to developing nations, nearly 50 percent of their total collections. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:25 am
Levitin also said that the problem could “cloud title to nearly every property in the United States” and could lead to trillions of dollars in losses. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:50 am
Ransomware attacks have grown almost exponentially for several reasons: The ransomware business model works, with the FBI stating that ransomware is on pace to become a one billion dollar source of income for cybercriminals in 2017; Ransomware start-up costs are cheap. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 10:40 am
Increasingly, however, the state is struggling. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 2:19 am
The funds obtained through the enforcement in the relevant EU Member State shall therefore invariably be paid to the relevant State treasury in Germany. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:02 am
Regardless, plaintiffs argued that they were entitled to strict scrutiny because required “sexually explicit” labels on video games had been struck down by the Seventh Circuit, and Brown v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 8:04 am
Supreme Court in Apple v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 5:24 pm
Additionally, the bill provides that the Commissioner of the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation may summarily revoke a franchise seller’s registration if the Commissioner finds: (a) there has been a failure to comply with any of the provisions of this law; (b) an offer or sale of the franchise would constitute misrepresentation, fraud, or deceit of the purchasers; (c) an applicant has failed to comply with any rule or order of the commissioner; or, (d) any person… [read post]
